Microsoft dangles $1 million prizes and Mercedes-AMG cars inside Edge as persistent pop-ups potentially spark fresh “bribery” backlash.

  • lb_o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Native persistent pop-up that doesn’t go away and stays on multiple tabs is truly the best way to advertisme your browser /s

  • gokayburuc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This disease is simply testing AI systems on your browsing data. It’s trying to collect data from your services and analyze it with AI. That’s all. If something is offering you big rewards, free services, or discounts, it’s probably using you as material for its services.

    • Saprophyte@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I have edge installed on my steam deck, I used it to play bf6 on game pass before they jacked up the price last year.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Yes but they do zero tests on the build, if it compiles, it ships. For example it crashes if you try to open a file dialog and the copilot button is not working and can’t be hidden

    • kungfuratte@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Should you ever feel the urge to do something wild and stupid: yes, actually Microsoft offers an official Linux version of Edge.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Hey Microsoft, how about innovating instead? Edge is a Chrome engine browser like dozens of others out there. Why not write a new browser engine to give customers a choice? Or at worst, how about contract with Apple to license Webkit bringing a third solid choice for a browser engine to Windows. You’re not going to out-Chrome Google Chrome browser, so stop trying.

    • Uairhahs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I’m gonna go out on a limb and play the devil’s advocate. Edge actually makes a lot of optimisations and improvements that are merged into upstream chrome. While Microsoft is the shady corp that is forcing the ai garbage and data collection, the Devs are actually very competent.

      Edge has one huge benefit which causes me to use it across Windows, Linux and even android and that is extension support on all even mobile. No other chrome based android browser has mobile extensions and a competent or seamless sync both figured out. I like being able to check something on my phone and seamlessly pick it up on any other device.

      I like Vivaldi’s workflow but they have yet to add mobile extensions.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Did you use IE when it was still around? Edge is their “new” offering, because of how terrible their own engine was. Moving back to their own engine would be a step backwards.

    • baatliwala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Bro yapping about something he knows fuck all about. MS has contributed a ton to upstream Chromium, from page rendering improvements to improved efficiency for battery consumption.

    • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Edge is a Chrome engine browser like dozens of others out there. Why not write a new browser engine to give customers a choice?

      they tried that with Edge 1.0

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Thats the description of both Vivaldi and Brave browsers, which also haven’t out-Chromed Chrome. Both are Chrome engine with built in ad blockers.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Exactly, the average person using installing browser add-ons. They want a lightweight, simple browser from a familiar brand that just works. Adblocking alone isn’t enough to convince Average Joe to switch, when they don’t even know that adblockers exist.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    165
    ·
    1 day ago

    They’re just making themselves look trashy and desperate.

    What might work is making their software better than everyone else’s. But that requires effort and skill and managerial competence.

  • new_guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    We started to use ad blockers in the early 2000s because no one could trust they were the 999,999 visitor to the website.

    It sounded (and stills sounds) scammy.

    • RedRibbonArmy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It started with pop-up blockers.

      Opera was the first major browser to incorporate tools to block pop-up ads; the Mozilla browser later improved on this by blocking only pop-ups generated as the page loads.[citation needed] In the early 2000s, all major web browsers except Internet Explorer let users block unwanted pop-ups almost completely. In 2004, Microsoft released Windows XP SP2, which added pop-up blocking to Internet Explorer. -Wikipedia

  • crandlecan@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    Let me guess… Existing users are excluded from participating? Cause I ain’t got no pop up banner anywhere. Or is cause I’m European?

  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Microsoft is a very large lumbering giant that seems to lack a cohesive vision forward, especially on the consumer front. Every single piece of consumer facing software lacks a cohesive design language, and seems to be regressing in usability. No one is truly primed to replace them yet in either the corporate or consumer businesses however, something like the MacBook Neo can certainly take a few points of market share away from the standard consumer

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is what happens when they get MBAs in charge. Same thing happened at Apple. The original guy with a vision in charge (Gates, Jobs) goes away and the company suffers for it.

        • 4am@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          22 hours ago

          At the time of Gates, they wanted to monopolize the operating system market because that was the way to lock people in. People owned hardware and in order to make the most money your needs your OS to be their platform so they had no choice but to pay you.

          Now in 2026 everyone’s OS is Chrome. So the goal is to make everyone depend on your cloud storage, on your productivity suite, on your chatbot, your automation platform, your cloud database. Then you give them just a state and then rent it to them in perpetuity.

          This is why they don’t mind making RAM too expensive. Drives people to inexpensive devices and subscriptions for services for the hardware they can no longer afford and don’t have the skills to maintain.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Steal the best parts of every other system, make Windows easy to develop for, and corner the business market.