Is it a war crime to attack the military leader? I kind of doubt that. Military targets are fine under international law.

What kind of measures do current Denuvo versions take that they need these kinds of bypasses?

Laughing is very healthy. You’re doing great!

My understanding, or assumption from considering classic physical goods, is that if you buy the digital product you may be able to resell it, but if you license it it’s not buying and you don’t own a product you can resell.

If GoG licenses you a product you can download and can archive, then it’s not bought and may not be resellable. (?)

Who manages the access, who platforms, and serves the NFT content?

If it’s up to the store to do so, you don’t need NFT for that. The store can already do that.

Ballistic.NG

Invalid weblink, so I’ll link the store page for BallisticNG, for anyone else who wants to take a peek

Ok, I’ll start removing the batteries instead and place it where it was then.

Overall production != local availability or accessibility

I’m confused. Excel is a spreadsheet, that’s always in the form of a table.

You can’t trust Palantir with any agreements, safeguards, or supposedly deidentified or anonymized data. They will use the data anyway, undisclosed. Immoral data is their business. Data association and connection is their business. And they have the scope, prevalence, and collected data for it.

Hospitals had Palantir? Wtf

“Leaderboard” where rank one scores 0.3% success lol

I find it unlikely to be about security. Either it is about control or about money (pressure to induce bribery for lifting), or a combination of both.

All it needs is a bribe from Cisco, and it’s no problem anymore. Probably.

If I were a network packet, I would get very confused by so much routing.

If we see a reversal of the policy soon then it was a standard playbook policy announcement to receive corrupt bribery money from some big manufacturers and importers. If we don’t, it may very well have been with no takers anyway.

We’ve seen it plenty before (within the last year). Like tarrifs, then exclusions, etc.

Sure, you can search for alternative sources, hope that the PDF is not just image-scans but indexed and searchable text, and that it has a jump-able table of contents, and that it has not been altered and is up to date. Or you can go through public implementations and try to replicate, infer, and follow implementations or third-party descriptions of the standard. But all of that is error-prone and time and effort investment.

It shouldn’t be like that. A standard should be public so that anyone can implement it, from either side. So anyone can verify and compare against the reference, and call out implementation misalignments.

What’s this image from?

I just want existing standards to be public and accessible, not locked behind 400 600 € ISO. That defeats the whole point of standards.

Systemd is more than an init system. Systemd was designed to be different from previous Unix-style single-/narrow-purpose services. Many distros making the switch seems to indicate that such a switch had significant enough upsides or necessities. No?

I read an article about why Systemd became what it is, and why it makes sense, and that made sense to me. Integration and a fully designed system has advantages over disconnected utilities and systems you have to connect and negotiate, especially on system- and boot-up level concerns.