Car companies passed a bunch of laws prohibiting competition and alternatives and got trillions in subsidies. Now they’re welfare programs for the nations dumbest and most pampered CEOs.
NYTrash is the worst imperial garbage.
Car dependency has always been an unsustainable grift benefiting the most privileged at the cost of the planetary destruction.
Don’t expect these liars to have a clue about this.
What really sux is oftentimes the more car friendly areas are expensive and the people living their drive cars because they have the money to buy there and have a car. I don’t get why they don’t live out further if they like cars so much but it is what it is.
They also forgot to put heavy cause of pollution in that title
The whole car-centric lifestyle is unhealthy and unsustainable.
I think realistically this is the only way public transport will start to be forced past the car companies that lobby against it. Once the actual labour starts getting hit and affected, they’ll have no choice.
American downtowns used to be sweet.
Most big cities had extensive electric trolleys you could hop on and off of for free. Walkable cities with decent public transportation that didn’t pollute the air!
And we replaced that so we could have a bunch of shitty cars burning leaded gasoline for decades…
Really explains the boomers and silent generation… And hell, Gen X probably grew up with some that sweet leaded gas fumes, and lead paint. And there’s still extensive lead pipes serving water.
There’s an episode of the Little Rascals where the kid wants to be a street car conductor. Not much demand for that job today. Boy, do they pick up the nickels!
For a handful of years, we’d keep lead additive in the truck. Every fill up we’d add lead to the tank. GenX with just a bit of lead in the brain.
Exactly. Lead fuel additives are still sold…
Race cars tend to use them. Explains NASCAR…
Aren’t “lead additives” lead free? My dad had an old car that needed leaded, and I remember he’d put some additive every time he went to refuel. I recently found a bottle in our basement, it pretty clearly said “lead replacement” and at a glance, the ingredients didn’t seem to contain anything that sounded like lead
Some have replaced lead.
Aviation gasoline (avgas) for piston aircraft still contains lead.
Certain racing fuels (off-road, track-only) may contain lead.
Some specialty or legacy industrial uses…
Makes sense. Aviation is all about certification and reliability, racing is performance above all else, and you’ll always find some old industrial machine in the back of a shop that has somehow been running since longer than anyone remembers.
Reminds me of how despite RoHS and all that, leaded solder is still a thing for some applications like (legacy) aviation and repairs (leaded and unleaded solder apparently don’t mix well, or rather, make things corrode or something like that)
I think they call that a galvanic response. Sometimes it’s favorable. Otherwise your support is galvanizing the other. Bad news.
Well well well if it isn’t the consequences of our own stupid actions
Read in another article yesterday, the avg price of an automobile is 50k in the US. Average.
Now people are using electric bikes and scooters.
That… seems good, right?
From an environmental standard, sure, but the true reason for it is genuinely disturbing.
What is disturbing about it? Cars are more expensive now, so we found something else? That’s the only way it would ever happen. People hate change. It is either “cars too expensive, so people change” or “traffic too terrible, so people change” or “cars too full of annoying electronics, so people change.”
Cars should not be so expensive that people have to start using scooters and skate boards to get around. That’s fine for students, but a moral governmental system should be able to offer essential goods at prices that working people can afford. We should be able to manufacture vehicles at an affordable price, and people should make enough income to pay it.
It would mean less profit for the parasites at the top, but I don’t care about that.
Why not? The Netherlands does just fine prioritizing cycling for everyone - on par with the “childish” scooters and skateboards.
“inexpensive car” is a myth that keep getting repeated. Car can seems cheap up front but it could inflate in cost in the long run due to fuel and maintenance. Not to mention it’s a deprecating asset, doing serious damage to the environment in the long run, dangerous machine that often misused.
“but my fuel is cheap!”
Yeah? Because it’s subsidised, using your tax that’s better used for something else.
You are talking about total cost of ownership.
Car can seems cheap up front
Not anymore, which is the point of this article.
“but my fuel is cheap!”
Don’t forget the “but muh freedom!”. Let them now enjoy their freedom to stay at home since there’s not even sidewalks :-|
Regardless of whether they are right or wrong, what a terrible article comparing all kinds of apples and oranges and jumping to conclusions.
Comparing apples and oranges is totally valid.
Oh, come on, you know what I mean. I am not complaining that the author compares different things on the same metric.
I am complaining that the author first tells a story about a worker who needs any reliable car to commute, then semi-complains about cars getting bigger and having more power, and then goes on to claim that a BYD (or was it another Chinese car?) has more HP than a Tesla, which I bet the worker from the story does not care about at all. That is sloppy at best, misleading at worst.
Or how they seem to compare base-model and “up to” prices. Yeah, if you tick all the boxes at the dealership, the car will be expensive, no shit.
Or how they list the average repair as $840, which they claim is more than many Americans can afford right now, without mentioning that maybe the average repair is skewed by some rich people doing repairs on their Ferrari, which might cost a bit more than changing the oil and replacing the clutch of the average worker’s beater car in Joe Smith’s No-Name Car Shop.
I am not even against the core observation or message of the article, cars suck in all but exceptional circumstances, and I want a society where most people don’t need and don’t have a car. But maaan.
The average transaction price for a new car now sits around $50,000.
I could ride a NYC subway or bus 16,666 times for that, assuming I never do more than 12 rides in a week to trip the “rest of the week is free” condition.
“Make cars cheaper” is a stupid solution that won’t scale well. Cars do tremendous damage to the environment and our society. But I expect everyone subscribed to “Fuck Cars” already knows that.
You can get a decent older, nothing fancy, riding horse for ~$3k and pay about $11k/yr for upkeep, significantly less if you’ve got space for them. Plus, ride the same route to and from the bar and they’ll memorize it- your own personal designated driver who like tips in apples!
$11k/yr for upkeep
That’s a lot. What’s included?
A horse mostly, they are expensive to keep around nowadays.
Yes, but what’s included for the horse? Food? Vet? Horseshoes? Grooming? Insurance? Apples? Do I still have to visit it daily or for $11/k there’s someone there taking care of him when I’m away?
Food, ferrier, routine healthcare, housing. Your biggest cost is housing, and the cost of that varies wildly by how fancy you want to get with it. I went with the low-mid end of decent amenities, similar to dog boarding. The horse has protection from elements, a bit of human interaction, space to be outside. I did not include insurance. However, ime, horse vets can be drastically less expensive than small animal vets for similar procedures. I have always gotten the impression this is because dog/cat healthcare is a much bigger industry and like human healthcare it jacks up the price because it can. I also didn’t include tack, but that’s also one of those things where the cost is dependent on how fancy one wants to get with it.
That does sound pretty cheap. In southern Spain I see people horse riding all the time. I live very close to a big city and I still pass people on horses on public roads from time to time. I think the biggest issue would be carrying my groceries. I would probably need a donkey too.
I have always gotten the impression this is because dog/cat healthcare is a much bigger industry and like human healthcare it jacks up the price because it can.
I learned from Rick & Morty that it’s because horses have bigger organs so less qualified surgeons can operate on them.
Western US here. I’m in an urban area where a lot of the farmland that turned into housing in the mid-1900s didn’t become modern subdivisions, so we still have sections of the city where people have enough land to keep their own horse, plus stables on the outskirts. Haven’t seen a horse in downtown in a while, but still see them on side roads, on the walking path along the river, and a lot in the hiking trails that run north of the city, which are basically an extension of the town at this point. When I was a kid in the 80s/90s there was a bar in the farm town about 6mi outside the city that had a hitching post out front and the cowboys still rode there to drink.
This country only works if gas is cheap…and it’s already too late for that. Oopsie daisy I guess.
Or electricity, if we weren’t afraid of change. But even with some of the highest electricity prices in the country, I pay about half what i would for gas
I pay about half what i would for gas
For now… But ultimately EVs are unsustainable too. It’s just kicking the can while the planet burns.
Don’t let perfect be the enemy of progress
Replacing ICE cars with EVs are a solid amount of progress, it’s progress within control of individuals, and it’s progress that can change society in a decade or two.
Transit and walkability would be better but I can’t do anything about that and significant progress would be a century or more.
Nah. With the right reforms, we could make cities walkable in a decade.
- Land value tax
- Carbon tax
- End single use zoning and upzone everything
- End parking minimums and free public parking
- Streamline building permits
- More in-the-weeds zoning reform, like removing minimum lot sizes, removing setbacks, removing aesthetic constraints, etc
- Defacto policy of not removing privately installed speed bumps that people make in front of their houses
Of course, good infrastructure and transit would be nice, too. But these reforms would cost very little money and could be implemented immediately, and would likely result in a city overrun with chaotic, uncontrollable ebike traffic - which I’m okay with.
That only affects new construction. Most places aren’t growing anywhere near fast enough for such a quick change, nor are there anywhere near enough contractors or supplies
My town has most of it (but nowhere should accept individuals impacting road safety and maintainability) and is somewhat walkable but most of that was from being built out before cars.
We did have a recent zoning change to encourage more higher density housing near the center (up to six stories “as of right” == streamlined process) and have several new apartment blocks going up, but there’s no way that’s sustainable and doesn’t help the walkability of the rest of town
i’m so grateful to live in a city with decent public transit (seattle)
none of my social life adventures would be possible without it
highly recommend cities if you’re able to. they’re always so much nicer to live in than suburbs or rural shitholes
Suburbs can be walkable. Rural areas, too, depending on your definition of walkable.
The Happy Motoring Society was never sustainable
“Now”??
deleted by creator
In 1979, when my parents bought a new Dodge Aspen wagon, its price of $5,000 was around the median car price, at about ⅓ of the median annual wage. That’s about $22,000 in 2026 dollars, which is about ⅓ of the median annual wage now. But the median car price is up to $50,000.
That’s about $22,000 in 2026 dollars,
If you believe the inflation numbers…
Well, yeah, inflation numbers are definitionally arbitrary even if you trust the math, since they depend so much on the judgement of the people compiling the data. The important point here is that the cost of a new car has gone up to a whole year’s pay, or more, for a lot of people.
“Back then the amount remained the same” > “Now the amount is growing”. But i get your point and agree cars were always expensive.
It makes sense if you define car ownership in ~2024 as “affordable”
Presumeably the article author has been insulated and didn’t realize that other people outside of their tax bracket exist.
I hear “the white imperial core” thrown around a lot.
