Not just hardened criminals, fucking pedophiles.

Andrew Taake tried to fuck a kid

Kyle Travis Colton had a bunch of child porn

Daniel Tocci had a child porn collection that would make Nobuhiro Watsuki blush

Andrew Paul Johnson molested kids

David Paul Daniel fucked kids and filmed it

And maybe more! I’ll keep searching

Sure, but where will they ever find a job working in a warehouse in California again?

Discord later banned the account for violating the TOS when lying about her age and stated they would only restore the account if they shared a photo of the kid along with a copy of her birth certificate or passport.

The guy who applies for the “looking at pictures of little girls” position at discord needs to be on every single list

Stuff some cash in an envelope and send it to Sweden for a totally anonymous mullvad account, download and set it up on your device (legal)

Download qbittorrent, go to the settings and bind it to your mullvad connection (legal)

Torrent every single 1 and 0 you consume, and seed that shit forever and eternity (mixed legality)

Why is there a pedestrian walking across the road while there’s a car coming at them at 35 mph?

Tell the truth all the time, be the most honest person everyone knows. That way when you really fuck something up they’ll believe you when you say it wasn’t you

If it’s gross porn or AI slop, instant block. For comments it’s only if we get like a dozen replies into an argument and I stop assuming they’re able to read

Firefox/Ublock origin + adguard DNS + sponsorblock. My personal devices are not billboards, and they haven’t allowed ads in years

Edit: youtube revanced on Android. Sponsorblock has saved me over 4 hours since I reinstalled the app earlier this year

I got permabanned from the whole site for calling Ann Coulter racist lmao

Yeah, it’s hard to draw a line, which is why for me it’s just a matter of whether the artist puts me off the work entirely or not. I can watch One Piece without my mind interrupting me about Oda being kinda problematic. But I can’t, for example, read Sandman without thinking of all the rapin Gaiman did though.

And sorry if anyone is learning about ol Rapin Gaiman here

Seems like it. In total fairness, he didn’t say the pedophilia was cool, he just enjoyed working with the guy. Also it’s Japan, so he’s gonna have to work alongside pedophiles at some point

Yeah I’m really sorry you had to learn it here. At least Oda and Araki are still cool

using the corpses of Jews

Making the corpses of Jews. The vast majority of Nazi “medical” “science” was just an excuse to torture people, and has no scientific use because they didn’t follow scientific practices like “writing stuff down”

Usually if the person who made something is a massive piece of shit, that just puts me off it entirely. For example, Rurouni Kenshin might be considered one of the best animes of all time, but I cannot watch it without thinking about the fact that the guy who made it had so much child porn. Sours everything the fucker touched

Like, maybe I could learn to separate the art from the artist, but… why would I? There’s already more art than I could ever consume made by people who don’t jerk it to kids

Depends how fast everyone else is going. If I’m the only one on the road, then I’m going the speed limit. Don’t want any cops using me to fill their quotas. If someone zooms by at 15 over the limit, I call them a canary, checking the coal mine for speed traps. If they don’t get pulled over going 75 in a 60, then I can safely go 65.

If there’s a bunch of cars all speeding, then I’ll keep pace with them unless they’re going over 70. At that point it just isn’t worth it to exponentially increase the energy of a collision while logarithmically reducing the time it takes to get to my destination. I’m not going to double my kinetic energy so I can save 15 seconds on my trip.

…wait, I think I misunderstood the question

Just c, if you have mass

You did it when you spent a considerable amount of space explaining how sexual abuse is different because these abusers don’t think they’re doing anything wrong, so society needs a way to police them.

Nope. I actually never once advocated for more surveillance, and in fact tacitly argued against it in this comment. I spent a considerate amount of space explaining why this is a massive issue that can’t easily be solved by simply telling people not to commit sexual assault, and that in order to reduce it, we need to educate people on what sexual assault is and instill in them the fact that they are capable of committing it. Like, I literally said that the problem was largely that we live in a society that normalizes sexual assault. This isn’t something that more surveillance could solve.

[…] and presented a huge cultural shift as the solution. This neatly leaves the uncareful reader to potentially conclude that the surveilance is a reasonable approach to deal with an intractable social problem.

No. The “huge cultural shift” I was talking about was a shift away from a culture that rationalizes and justifies sexual assault, which I made clear in the same paragraph in which I said “enormous cultural shift.” I forgot that Lemmings can’t read, and that was my bad.

*Edited the formatting to make my argument flow better

I like to think that jumping spiders could easily kill us with their bites, but they’re simply too sweet to even think about attacking us

This applies to my hypothetical giant spider puppies

Give

Me

Giant

Pet

Salticids

When did I rationalize mass surveillance?