I heard this somewhere.

  • gigastasio@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Correct. It was a misunderstanding. From what I remember someone from Al’s label said he had the go ahead from Coolio to do the parody. Only after it was released did Coolio make public statements about it, and Al tried to apologize but I don’t think Coolio was having it.

    I don’t know how copyright law applies to satire but in my head, a parody of a song uses enough of the original material that you’d still need permission.

      • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not necessarily. Parody allows for a “percentage changed vs original work” when deciding whether copyright was infringed. Al was always perfectly within his rights to do the parody, but he’s a stand up guy and tries never to do a song that the original artist didn’t approve.