They craved the reach.

This is what convinces many people to stay. They desire the attention. And the accounts desperate for attention range from big companies, to small artists.

Last year I asked the HR block ai chat bot thing a question and it got it wrong.

Did YouTube have manual review in the first years? Apple has always had review.

Wow, that’s pretty damming. Three of them? This can’t be a random absurd error like it plausibly could have been for the first one reported.

There must be a really big flaw in their system if three VPN devs just “missed an email”. Is Microsoft sending the emails from a bullshit sus address?

That’s… that’s a lot of hard drives. Or a lot of rented server space.

That’s many many weeks of downloading.

deleted by creator

I wasn’t wrong in this reply. I was asked about believing Anthropic.

Are you saying they are lying? Why should I disbelieve Anthropic?

Whoops, I conflated it with other recent talk about their models not following restrictions set in prompts and deciding for itself that it needed to skirt instructions to achieve its task.

You are correct.

Well, for now. I’m sure any of those 12 partner companies they called out as new security partners will end up leaking that this is all lies eventually. If it’s just made up bullshit.

Anthropic announced new partnerships to inform the companies of security issues and to work with them to fix said issues. If it’s bullshit, it’s gonna be wasting their time. And that’ll surface eventually.

The meme still applies to people asking the AI to tell them what they wanna hear, and delusional people spiraling with sycophantic AI.

But I believe Anthropic when they say their models are not working as intended and posing security risks.

Claude Mythos Preview’s large increase in capabilities has led us to decide not to make it generally available," Anthropic wrote in the preview’s system card. “Instead, we are using it as part of a defensive cybersecurity program with a limited set of partners.”

Typing out “well, actuallies” on a watch doesn’t sound like fun.

That’s hilarious but the post is about the ai not doing what it’s told. You know?

Damn, how do they keep the track metadata in such a small file?

I feel like my iTunes (Apple Music) library data is at least that big.

Holy shit, I just looked up the Samsung USB SSDs (T5, T6, T7).

T7 1TB

• $108.02 - Sept 2024
• $274.99 - Today

I can only think of reasons that are meant to block you based on what you are using to augment your browsing experience.

“Yo, have you used your Cash App pay later yet? I could use some money man. I can pay you back next week and you can pay it off.”

This is, in part, a tool to get people to get others to join the platform.

Who didn’t provide you text to concentrate on?

I’m serious, do you mean this Lemmy post and the OP?

They are all examples of seeking short snippets over long form reading. We are being habituated to do that. And there are people that proudly say and do these things and promote the culture of doing these things. People are doing it in this thread.

Reading with intention.

All that other shit people say or do these things with:

• only read the headline
• comment after only reading the headline
• say “tldr”
• skim emails
• disengage from long and detailed group chat chats, skipping to the end and saying “I didn’t read all of that, but…”
• using AI to summarize emails and long articles

Etc.

How big could a websit… oh. Oh my.

They would just stop building garages my guy.