• 0 Posts
  • 28 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle



  • Hm I know it’s common for me. If it isn’t in canada or elsewhere, then that’s just lazyness and a lack of care by your isp/router manufacturer (which makes sense cuz theres a monopoly on internet over there right? (Rip)).

    Anywho, adult filter blocks on routers are a really easy thing to implement. If it isn’t then they simply don’t care to help explore the simplest of options for parents restricting access to bad sites.

    I’ve heard of apps you can get for child devices that do a similar thing and let parents track their kids, which might be better anyways, assuming they arent a privacy nightmare (if parents dont prefer buying a smarter router).


  • I think if you as a parent have router controls and block adult content on their mobile plan if they have one (which I have seen as an option), then you are already doing a lot.

    Most routers from ISPs come with “adult” content filtering enabled by default I think, at least the ones I’ve had have had this on.

    VPNs already work and I can’t see them not working, so that’s always an option I guess, but they are also still an option with ID laws (ie connect to a region where they have no such laws).

    Children’s safety online can’t involve limiting access and tracking everyone who ever goes online with their national ID attatched to every request (basically).

    I think it’d be better if we explored the option that involves a parent blocking websites either on your network or on a device they give to you.


  • Let’s not pretend that these laws actually do protect children…

    There is always a way around something and if there’s any population to figure it out, it’s the ones with the most free time.

    The difference between going to a bar and using the internet: Showing your ID at a bar doesn’t mean it’s stored on some server possibly ready to be stolen by hackers. It also doesn’t automatically link all of your user data to your id (like it does right now) and make it easier to track your movements everywhere you go.

    These laws help no one except the elite. They restrict us, limit access to information and eventually cause our data to be comprimised.

    Bad parents exist, but does that mean we lockdown the most expansive knowledge base for everyone? I don’t believe this will stop any children of bad parents from being exposed to horrible things online. Age gates don’t stop that (because they either get bypassed or another site exposes even worse stuff without the age gate).





  • There’s value in real privacy friendly VPNs (think Mullvad), otherwise you just end up trusting some other, probably very shady actors with all your data instead.

    Unless you need one for specific things like using free wifi safely, torrenting or getting around restrictions then there is not much benefit.

    Most VPNs won’t even work for daily browsing as far as I’m aware. You’ll get hit with way more captchas and potentially just not be able to access certain sites because someone has either got the vpn providers ip banned temporarily on the site or the site bans IP addresses associated with servers.

    Personally, for generic browsing, I’m not too concerned if my ISP can see the domain names I’m accessing. I, as you probably do, only use HTTPS everywhere so the domain name is the most they’ll know, but you can do some work to try limiting exposure with DNS over HTTPS (DoH), etc if you want to.

    There’s also TLS 1.3 addition of ECH which further helps by hiding the hostname.

    Of course your ISP will always know the IP address you send packets to, but that is an even smaller problem.

    And my final note: just use one when you need to, I don’t think it’s necessary to have one on 24/7 at home like some people advise and NEVER use a free vpn or one of the more mainstream ones (mullvad is best, second choice is AirVPN).


  • dogs0n@sh.itjust.workstoFuck Cars@lemmy.worldSeems effective
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    (when a city is designed well, most cases there is no need for a bike lane, but I agree more bike lanes please!)

    I do not want to be doing this to bike riders

    You don’t have to, do you? I’m not sure it works as well for a bus because they are wider, but if you drive a car there’s the option of passing too closely or waiting for enough space in traffic to pass safely. Does that not work in a bus? Would waiting for a gap take hours in a bus?