If you already have one that seems wasteful

they call it that because it usually is a fallacy

not what OOP said. why is this such a trigger for you that basic reading comprehension goes out the door?

of course, but the OP said independent

I highly doubt that. how would that even work? a third-party to the publisher would have to check every statement before the issue goes to print. I can’t imagine this happening for anything that is not research papers or official reports.

but I happy to learn something new.

in what world would independent fact checking down to the level of individual quotes be feasible for an online magazine? you can’t be serious.

Believe it or not, this is the first time for me being suspected a troll, but I start to see the appeal when people are getting so worked up while being so far off the mark.

Sorry to disappoint that I am still on the loose. Then again prison is probably better than doing one more D-FMEA.

I was sure this would happen, I was quite facetitious. OP’s blanket statement just rubbed me the wrong way.

poes_law.gif

That’s why unit and integration tests shouldn’t be written by Copilot.

Firewalled VM with no personal or professional data on it. So no.

Because i want to work on meaningful things that benefit people directly.

Because i want to unterstand the capabilities and limitations of openclaw-like agents. LLMs aren’t going away, better be proactive and learn what the hype is about.

I program medical devices for a living and I have openclaw and nanobot running at home. AMA.

What makes you say this?

Well crafted counter argument

The thing with being cocky is, if you are wrong it makes you look like an even bigger asshole

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlphaFold

The program uses a form of attention network, a deep learning technique that focuses on having the AI identify parts of a larger problem, then piece it together to obtain the overall solution.