By all rights, this should be something I am deeply passionate about. I’ve been in tech/engineering my entire adult life and was obsessed with NASA as a kid. I even live on the east coast of Florida and can sometimes see the launches/landings over the ocean. But I just… don’t care at all. I’m not suffering from depression or any other malaise, and generally things are fine. But I haven’t clicked on a single link or looked at a single image. I know this has not been the case for many, many people, so I’m wondering what might be different about this launch (or really the whole program in general), and curious if anyone else has found themselves feeling the same.

    • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That goddamn scandal. The persecution of minorities and the warmongering. The socio-political climate now is far worse compared to the Apollo missions then conducted at the time the US government was unpopular mainly because of the Vietnam War.

      The arguments against Artemis aren’t surprising as these also mirror the skepticism towards the Apollo program.

    • Beacon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s more than that. The thought of us doing something incredible like establishing a permanent moon base feels more depressing than inspiring these days because enshitification will be baked into it right from the planning stages

      • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If the Untied States manages to survive the mess it is in, it will probably declare ownership of the moon and declare anyone else who manages to land there illegal aliens…including actual aliens

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have become very cynical of tech over the past several years and am strongly opposed to any sort of space colonization.

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          Me to. Theres a podcast called “tech won’t save us” that i hate listening to because it reminds me how much we have lost.

        • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I get your sentiment but that’s exactly why we need space colonization.

          There is a thing called translatio imperii which means that empires aren’t created nor destroyed, they just move from one location to the next, always on the frontline of humanity.

          If we don’t get spaceflight, the US will stay an imperial entity for eternity. Only if space colonization succeeds, mars can become the next empire which means that the US stops being one, interestingly.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            That’s complete and utter bullshit.

            “Frontline of humanity” what does that even mean, historically? Humanity has always been spread across the earth.

            I see absolutely no evidence for this historically, what I see is just people in the Middle Ages trying to brand themselves as the successors to Rome for PR.

            The idea of Mars becoming an “empire” is pure fantasy. We can’t even begin to talk about the lack of natural resources when there’s literally no air. Maybe in 40,000 years or something, but not on any foreseeable timescale.

            If we don’t get spaceflight, the US will stay an imperial entity for eternity.

            This is straight up magical thinking. You might as well say that someone has to sacrifice a virgin goat on the night that the stars are in alignment for the US empire to end. There is zero logical or causal connection between those things, and empires don’t just last “eternally” unless somebody casts the right magic spell.

            • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Maybe in 40,000 years or something, but not on any foreseeable timescale.

              Similarly, the NYT predicted in 1903 that it would take “one million to ten million years for humanity to develop an operating flying machine” (airplane). The wright brothers achieved the first powered airplane flight sixty-nine days later. Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Machines_Which_Do_Not_Fly

              You might want to think about this.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                22 hours ago

                A technological breakthrough could make Mars colonization feasible. It might even be possible for it to be self-sustaining. Who knows?

                But an empire? That’s utterly ridiculous. You might as well say that the thing that the American empire will last eternally unless and until we genetically engineer a race of intelligent dragons who will replace it with a dragon empire, and if anyone expresses skepticism of that fantasy, you could just as easily point to “people didn’t think the Wright Brothers could fly.”

                One wrong skeptic a hundred years ago doesn’t mean every fantasy is going to happen. There’s countless predictions that didn’t come true.

                  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 hours ago

                    Because earth has vastly better natural resources. It would be like trying to build an empire in Antarctica or the Sahara. At least those have air!

                    With Mars, the environment is completely inhospitable to humans, there’s no soil to grow food, no air to breathe, no nothing. To even set up a research station there would be a big achievement, to make that self-sustaining would be an incredible advancement. But you’re skipping the research station, skipping the colony, skipping the independent state, and going straight to empire without solving any of the problems in between. How are you even going to feed or provide oxygen to a Martian empire?

                    America was full of vast, untapped natural resources, and it still took nearly 200 years to become a superpower, after European powers devastated each other.

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Fuck that. Saying empires are inevitable is a lot like saying fascism is inevitable. Maybe it’s true but you shouldn’t identify with the thing and make it’s purpose your own

      • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Class warfare will be the foundation it’s all built on. Any tech developed for the moon, Mars, whatever - anything we gain in knowledge in return - is going to go to benefit rich fuckers, not you. One day there will be more space tourists. Rich people, not you. Maybe one day Man will even colonize another world. Rich people, not you.

          • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            24 hours ago

            In case we’re not familiar with the cultural/economic backdrop of Bladerunner, etc.:

            spoiler

            all humans that could afford to leave the planet had done so long before the period the first movie was set in, and those humans that couldn’t quietly, secretly turned into unpaid, unwitting sublime training nodes for each new model of replicant —until said trainees failed to recall their synthetic origins, and could replace the humans without any blowback, scrutiny, or awareness of it at all, really. 😶

            This is not scifi. This is where those fucknuts are aiming our species. 🥲

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ay?

          Do you mean only the super rich will be able to travel?

          The only travel anyone will be doing in the next 100 years or more will be going to the moon to squeeze into a tiny smelly hab module to figure out how to avoid getting regolith in your ass crack.

          I think space travel will be the exclusive reserve of hard core science nuts.

          Even in say 500 years. Will there be a “colony” on Mars with anything more than a dozen science nerds? I doubt it.