• Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Don’t worry though, because there’s no way your ID verification for adult sites will ever get leaked

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Dunno why your obvious joke about the effectiveness of age verification was downvoted

            • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Not sure if this hack has a name, but usually once someone in a comment tree makes a joke about downvotes — e.g., clowning on an edit complaining about a downvote — rules are suspended for all comments that follow, and you can accrue lots of downvote salutes FOR FREE.

              (Maybe not my comment since I’m late to the downvote party, but here you go;)

              Edit: why the upvotes? :(

              Edit edit: 1v1 me irl

  • TerdFerguson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    LMAO at anyone who made, or paid for, a PornHub account.

    “Yes, I would like to log into PornHUB using my GMail account, please, for my convenience” - I just checked, they have SSO for Gmail and Twitter! AHAHAHAHAHAHA I’m dying

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    If PornHub has any of your data, congratulations, you are an idiot.

    They have endless supplies of free content you don’t even have to login to watch, and they don’t block ad-blockers or VPNs afaik.

  • darthinvidious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh, but the children are safe and priority and that’s why they want to verify them. Oh but the children. Think about the children!!! CHILDREN!!!

  • bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Pornhub has not worked with Mixpanel since 2021, which means that the stolen data would be from that year or earlier. Reuters, who contacted some Pornhub customers to confirm the breach, was able to authenticate that the user data that pertained to those customers was accurate – but was several years old which would be consistent with the Mixpanel data.

    We checked our accounts and this is what we found…

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hello Sir… Good news is I’m not calling to talk about our Lord and Saviour. Bad news, can you verify your identity and daily access to the following pornhub fetishes?

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    According to ShinyHunters, the records contain extensive data on Premium members including email addresses, activity type, location, video URL, video name, keywords associated with the video and the time the event occurred. Activity types include whether the subscriber watched or downloaded a video, or viewed a channel and events include search histories.

    haha

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    According to ShinyHunters, the records contain extensive data on Premium members including email addresses, activity type, location, video URL, video name, keywords associated with the video and the time the event occurred. Activity types include whether the subscriber watched or downloaded a video, or viewed a channel and events include search histories.

    This sort of thing is one of those examples why “no log, no profile” service is probably a good idea. The service could have offered the option to charge a fee for access, but not retain customer activity data. They didn’t do that. At some point down the line, someone got ahold of the data, which I imagine that their customers are not really super keen on having floating around attached to their identities.

    Probably a lot of companies out there that log and retain a lot of data about their customers.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      At some point on the Web (in my childhood, in the Russian-speaking parts - around 2002-2004) anything requiring registration was treated as some sort of closed club, and that was about just registration. Though people exposed their ICQ UINs and email addresses, so that you could chat with them (that’s the old way you’d DM a person whose post you liked).

      I’m not sure about all these rules of what websites should and shouldn’t do. Perhaps websites should be always treated as some untrusted alien space that can possibly do anything. If you want to do something where such a leak is really bad, or anything worse than a pocket theft of 20$ - then perhaps such a system shouldn’t rely upon untrusted centralized service having everything.

      I like the social model that existed then, though. It was somewhat global, now we have modern Web services (even if in Fediverse) that expose everything over the Web, posts, DMs and so on. Back then forums were websites, DMs were in ICQ\XMPP\Skype, email as its own thing, feeds as RSS.

  • danekrae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have heard people try to explain why they log in on porn sites: It saves your favorite videos, it recommends new videos and it makes it possible to see paid content.

    All three things are reasons why I don’t want to log in. Yeah, like I want a list of my perversions attached to my name.