Why would they be acting? It’s probably not a first amendment test.

If I had to guess, I’d say LLMs are about 20 years away from creating viable programs that are slightly more complex than hello world.

What actually happened, apparently. Fire them to avoid payout.

You say “the right” and yet half the time I see terminally online lunatics calling leftists fascist because they support organizing the working class, don’t want to abolish Israel, or have objections to trans women in sports. Literally calling them fascists and right wing. So on here, it’s totally distorted.

That is mind blowing to me. I wouldn’t even think of it for anything meaningful.

I pay for nitro because I love discord and love supporting it. I will cancel if they go through with this nonsense.

Wait, what are people using it for? I use discord for shooting the shit with people about video games and politics.

There was no implication that this was a general poll designed to demonstrate the general public’s attitudes. I’m not sure why you mentioned this.

Are they really able to replicate pornography like that? I know that for normal stuff, the videos are only under ten seconds or so.

Let’s also remember that AI has many different meanings. It depends on what technology they’re using. AI is just literally a type of computer program that can be used for a variety of things.

Not banning good people, banning wrong people.

You are running into the individualistic vs societal issues problem. A big component of fighting back is taking on corporate power via industrial regulation.

I was hoping you’d play along :’(

Cool

I have been doing IT since 1867 and I’ve never run into an issue.

Banning ideas and opinions is not banning fascism. But let’s start over. First, they banned me. All I did was say that banning people for having the opinion “Israel should exist as an entity” is authoritarian. I wasn’t even defending Israel, which, like I said, people should be allowed to do as part of normal freedom of speech.

Second, I didn’t even say anything extreme, like “you should be hanged for treason!” or some such nonsense. I said “you have the right to ban people for whatever you want since it’s your instance, but I think that’s fascist if you do so.” And they banned me. Do you think that’s even remotely normal behavior?

Banning people for their behavior and conduct is perfectly reasonable. Also, if some Israel defender comes in and says “I don’t care how many children need to be killed, it’s worth it,” then I think you have every right to ban them. Advocating murder is crazy shit. But simply saying “Israel has a right to exist” or something similar as being ban worthy? That’s absolute ghoulish authoritarianism. There’s no such thing as “banning fascism” because this is just a discussion forum.

Fascists. Authoritarians. Whatever you want to call them. I’ll explain. They submitted a proposal to ban all “Zionists or Zionist apologists” and I objected on the grounds that it is, objectively, the very fascism they were denouncing. They banned me simply for suggesting this. That’s what I’m talking about.

Since you do not understand even the smallest aspect of what I said, you are not in a position to make such a judgment.

“Strong left bias” is not bias, it is just a reflection of normal human decency. If you mean that fake leftists like the dbzero fascists are around a lot, I would agree and it’s a problem.

It was censored right next to it not being censored. Rather amusing.