

he left Bluesky around 2 years ago


he left Bluesky around 2 years ago


This is true that some blurs could be undone, but the ones used in the files are definitely destructive and cannot be undone. Grok and any other image generation tool is also definitely not capable of doing it. It requires knowledge of how it was blurred so you can use the same algorithm to undo it, models simply guess what it should look like.


Agreed, using a planning phase makes a huge difference. It will break the implementation into steps, making reviewing or manually refactoring parts of the code far more easily.


This is AI generated garbage with no sources.


Thats a valid point, but I still feel its a less direct form of support, which was my point. I dont feel that it is the same as directly financially supporting a project you morally disagree with.


Using Lemmy isn’t giving that tankie money.
Pretty much lol. If I remember correctly his reason for leaving was them adding moderation tools