Mugita Sokio

AI can already do that with around 90% confidence.

Ah yes, the NWO being put into place.

Nothing to see here.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

It turns out she’s a goddess: https://eastindiabloggingco.com/2020/11/19/goddess-columbia/

We’re going towards the New World Order, which will be ruled by the Vatican. They’re the ones who will enforce it. D.C. (District of the Roman goddess, Columbia) will be used as the militant and intelligence arm, London is the trade and financial arm, and Vatican City is the political and religious arm of the NWO.

This is the 7th Vial of Revelation according to historicists.

Edit: As for post-surveillance, we’re worse off than we were over 25 years ago. People are waking up to it, but the Vatican (specifically, the Jesuits) are attempting to shut it down before too long (otherwise, they’ll be noticed as those who rule with iron fists).

It’s hard to say on many levels. However, to keep things brief, I’d say that the “Dead Internet Theory” is no longer a theory, but rather… law.

It isn’t Free Software from what I took a look at.

Azire in particular.

I’ve never heard about it. I just took a look, and it’s from the Malwarebytes guys. My issue with it is that it’s proprietary, save for a lone BASH script that happened to be under GPL-2.0, which allows for tivoization.

There’s a reason why I didn’t mention Air instead of those three I named:

• All three I named are the following:
  • Free Software (libreware, despite being SaaS)
  • Outside 5-Eyes and 9-Eyes
  • AES-256
  • Audited

Yep, Kape… an Israeli malware distributor.

PIA is Israeli now (Kape Technologies, a malware distributor).

There are only three good ones, in no particular order:

• IVPN
• Mullvad
• Proton

Any other VPN used is a mistake.

It unfortunately goes to a Khazar (I’m a partial Khazar, what most of y’all call a partial “Jew”), so I get the sentiment.

I think you can easily use a VPN at the router level for you (as long as you have a modem set to bridge mode, and bridge a router of your choice to it), and that way, you’ll at least protect yourself a bit (DNS comes first).

I was also recommending my family not get Starlink, though many people on the right shill it (reviews seem to be skewed for purely political reasons). However, on the technical front, HughsNet and one other service (I forget who) use higher orbit satellites, and apparently, their speeds and bandwidth are garbage for the price people pay for that sort of thing. To be fair about it, however, your biggest issue with Starlink is the surveillance, as it could be offered for free in the future. However, if that’s the case, it’s our data we pay with instead of some sort of monetary value.

You don’t need to do a humiliation ritual about it, thank you very little.

You can simply opt out of it for now. Eventually… good luck if Starlink enshittifies.