** Iran is right about which rules are universal **

I don’t know how much clearer it gets??? Who’s gonna argue that UNCLOS is universal anyway? The US or pissrael? Neither of which are party to the UNCLOS and who very much assert authority outside their territorial waters?

yes

Iran is right about which rules are universal (innocent passage, not transit passage). … The U.S. is also not a party to UNCLOS.

Those iran’s waters. These ships are literally passing through their country, I think you’re confused with “territorial waters” as defined in UNCLOS as well but neither Iran nor the US nor pissrael ratified that treaty. Here is a good opinion on why the UNCLOS doesn’t really apply

https://www.simplelaw.blog/p/the-strait-of-hormuz-a-3-minute-international

I thought they meant this law but wasn’t sure. That treaty has not been ratified by the US, Pissrael and most importantly, Iran! So it doesn’t apply and we are talking about a war where neither the invading nations nor the victim nation has signed it.

https://www.simplelaw.blog/p/the-strait-of-hormuz-a-3-minute-international

Which law?

it’s a fucking toll you dingus those are iranian waters

Source on russia having ties to the AfD then??

We know Musk loves to support far-right parties all over the world and has openly supported the AfD so it’s not much of a stretch to say that he also financially supports them, but what is there wrt Russia other than “zomg the russians are eveel and hate our ‘’‘superior’‘’ society because of how much better we are than them”

bullshit on the AFD support by russia. It’s backed by Musk and other yankees.

Here is a good study guide for the basics: https://lemmy.ml/post/43309494

oh not at all, it’s an easy mistake to make when someone isn’t versed in communist terminology.

No, you got the wrong message “Bourgeois society” is a society that has the “proletarian <-> bourgeois” contradiction, not “the society of the bourgeoisie”.

The bourgeoisie don’t have the option to decide. They have to go with barbarism or there won’t be a bourgeoisie anymore. They cannot choose socialism ever, it’s scientifically impossible. They’d have to become class traitors first. Commit class suicide. Only then, when they are no longer bourgeoisie can they choose. Here is great excerpt of “Socialism: Utopian and Scientific” by Engels that talks about Robert Owen who experienced this first hand (and who eventually committed class suicide very much to his credit) https://www.marxists.org/glossary/people/o/w.htm#owen

Friedrich Engels once said: “Bourgeois society stands at the crossroads, either transition to socialism or regression into barbarism.” What does “regression into barbarism” mean to our lofty European civilization? Until now, we have all probably read and repeated these words thoughtlessly, without suspecting their fearsome seriousness. A look around us at this moment shows what the regression of bourgeois society into barbarism means. This world war is a regression into barbarism. The triumph of imperialism leads to the annihilation of civilization. At first, this happens sporadically for the duration of a modern war, but then when the period of unlimited wars begins it progresses toward its inevitable consequences. Today, we face the choice exactly as Friedrich Engels foresaw it a generation ago: either the triumph of imperialism and the collapse of all civilization as in ancient Rome, depopulation, desolation, degeneration – a great cemetery. Or the victory of socialism, that means the conscious active struggle of the international proletariat against imperialism and its method of war. This is a dilemma of world history, an either/or; the scales are wavering before the decision of the class-conscious proletariat. The future of civilization and humanity depends on whether or not the proletariat resolves manfully to throw its revolutionary broadsword into the scales. In this war imperialism has won. Its bloody sword of genocide has brutally tilted the scale toward the abyss of misery. The only compensation for all the misery and all the shame would be if we learn from the war how the proletariat can seize mastery of its own destiny and escape the role of the lackey to the ruling classes.

This was Rosa Luxemburg in 1915. The regression into barbarism was brutal. Lets not lose sight of “the only compensation for the misery and all the shame”

goes on communist website
built by communists that got kicked out of reddit
i like this, but what about all those communists???

Warms my heart 🥰

Your limits, your rules, safety first politeness second!

That’s already the case, the question is what should happen to the votes before the ban

This person is obsessed with partioning for some reason, I think they genuinely believe that the nationstate is some naturally occuring phenomenon? I think their retort would be that it was only temporary or something, absolutely baffling behavior

The point behind using "death to " is (for me at least)

a) kill any respect that got indoctrinated to the nationstate. I spit on genocidesmany and on pissrael

b) acknowledge that said “dismantling” will be a very violent affair

Islamophobia is much more prevalent in the west than antijudaism. There is islamophobia on a systemic level. And lets not pretend that it’s directed only at muslims but arabs in general. Crying “antisemitism!!” about an indigenous armed resistance movement is the #alllivesmatter of this conflict.

https://crazypeople.online/post/15390150