minus-squareHiramFromTheChi@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•How do you argue against "I have nothing to hide" in relation to privacy and security?linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoIsn’t that part of the problem? There shouldn’t be that many links. That’s sorta the point. In reality, if they were all catalogued, there would be hundreds of thousands, maybe millions. Also: The most important part of this page is the essential reads section. That part doesn’t change. Whether you read em yourself or send em to your person to read—that’s up to you. But the point of that is to gather arguments and POVs that you might otherwise miss and apply to your offline life. I, for example, really like Schneier’s essay. It’s very concise and powerful in translating the “why.” I sent this to an old family member who doesn’t know the first thing about technology, and they understood it. If it’s not helpful to you, then it is what it is. Might be to someone else. linkfedilink
minus-squareHiramFromTheChi@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•How do you argue against "I have nothing to hide" in relation to privacy and security?linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoidcaboutprivacy linkfedilink
Isn’t that part of the problem? There shouldn’t be that many links. That’s sorta the point.
In reality, if they were all catalogued, there would be hundreds of thousands, maybe millions.
Also: The most important part of this page is the essential reads section. That part doesn’t change.
Whether you read em yourself or send em to your person to read—that’s up to you.
But the point of that is to gather arguments and POVs that you might otherwise miss and apply to your offline life.
I, for example, really like Schneier’s essay. It’s very concise and powerful in translating the “why.”
I sent this to an old family member who doesn’t know the first thing about technology, and they understood it.
If it’s not helpful to you, then it is what it is. Might be to someone else.