flandish

ok. so I think what you see as commenter wants to call them lies is descriptive of what the corporations are pushing (as “hallucinations” but what a reasonable person would call lies)

In other words it’s a “meta” conversation that I concur with. A LLM cannot do human things obviously, but “sales” can portray them as such.

In my day to day usage I make an actual effort to refer to that stuff that is wrong from an LLM as wrong. Not with human focused words.

I concur.

“Hallucinations” are things humans do. An AI can only just be wrong. Even when it makes up data, it’s just a stochastic parrot.

call yourself whatever you want and feel comfortable with. change it over time. or not. it’s up to you to feel whole in your own mind, heart, and skin. it’s not that you need to react a way a community requires. especially online ones.

be you. lesbian. or not. the “haters” can hate.

for. real.

damn! also ouch.

nice thing i always remember in the fd: if it’s going to kill you, you’d be dead. (hazmat, fire, etc) So don’t worry and do what you’re there to do.

in the case of OP, relaxing and dying is probably all i’d do. i have people “up there” waiting for me anyway. 🤷‍♀️

I hope this helps other victims get proper resolution.

and it’ll be full of holes. gov agencies are not known for bringing “a game” to tech laws… lol

cough

https://www.techdirt.com/2026/02/25/hackers-expose-the-massive-surveillance-stack-hiding-inside-your-age-verification-check/

why are the harm reduction methods we have now not being used?

setting that flag involves the leakable process.

have you seen any existing tools be so bulletproof that kids cant get around them?

exactly. so why do we need more laws that also happen to provide massive leak able tracking to corporations and govs without warrants, etc?

putting burden for safety on corps is not a healthy thing.

if they are claiming the new laws are for kid safety there must be existing already some external evidence of the need, no?

mlem is not showing me votes. so dunno what you are talking abt.

my point is that we have laws already that are perfectly appropriate to the “concern” stated, “child safety.”

any new laws will only give more access to important data to corporations who are known to do bad things with it.

that does not make it worth it. my opinion would change if there was a legit large inrush of charges using exiting laws that then did nothing to help, then one could argue we need more law. but thats just not the case today.

correct. i am a gen x software engineer and I know for a fact my kid who is now 25 would always find ways around firewalls when he was 14 and horned up.

my point is that we have laws already that are perfectly appropriate to the “concern” stated, “child safety.”

any new laws will only give more access to important data to corporations who are known to do bad things with it.

that does not make it worth it. my opinion would change if there was a legit large inrush of charges using exiting laws that then did nothing to help, then one could argue we need more law. but thats just not the case today.

for ex: if you let your kid look at porn, in the US, the parents are absolutely liable for various forms of “risk of injury to a child “ laws.

no it wont. kids get around shit easier than ever especially with luddite parents.

if the gov actually cared they’d take to charging using existing laws.