• 1 Post
  • 28 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle
  • Not if you consider door to door times.

    (Obligatory “fuck cars and car-oriented developments” but to play devil’s advocate here)

    If driving: Most people’s cars are parked in their garage/driveway, or on the street or in a group lot very near by. This means 0-1 minutes to get to the car. Snowy weather can add 1-10 minutes of cleaning/idling time, but since we’re talking about a development in AZ I’m not going to count that here. There’s the drive itself. Then there’s finding parking (time required is very location-dependent, but since a grocery store was mentioned, those usually have huge dedicated lots that require 0-1 additional minutes to park). Then there’s the walk from the parking spot to the store (again, for a typical US grocery store, that’s about 1-2 minutes). So all in all, door to door times are only a few minutes longer than the drive itself, if that.

    If taking transit: The typical numbers in American urban planning for a reasonable transit distance are 1/4 mi for a bus and 1/2 mi for a train. It takes 15-20 min for a healthy adult to walk one mile, but that doesn’t include time to cross intersections (waiting for signal or gap in traffic). This will obviously vary wildly based on the route, 0-5 minutes depending. Doing some averaging math, you’re looking at about 4 minutes to walk to a bus stop and 8 to a train, but up to 7 minutes bus and 15 minutes train (and I’m leaving out the time to get into the station because it varies wildly, but large stations can add several minutes just to get to the bus/train itself). Then there’s the wait; you can reduce the wait at the stop by using an arrival app, but you still can’t leave at exactly when you want like with a car, so I’m negating that benefit. Frequent service in the US is defined as anything from every 5-15 minutes depending on location and time of day, so average of 10 min, which gives an average wait time of 5 minutes. Then there’s the ride: with only exception of the rare BRT, buses are always much slower than driving on account of all the stops and still being subject to the same traffic as cars. Trains fare somewhat better, although not streetcars, and many US trains follow interstates, where cars are traveling much faster than the train. So what might be a ten minute drive may be more like 15-20 minutes via transit. (Then there’s a potential transfer if your destination doesn’t happen to be along the transit route = more waiting and a potential longer travel time if driving would utilize a more direct route.) Then there’s the walk from the bus/train to the destination, another 4-8 minutes. Taken together, door to door times via transit can easily end up being 2-3x longer than the trip itself (and many more times longer than driving the same route would have been).

    So considering all factors, a “30 minute drive” will get you much farther and to many, many more places than a “30 minute transit trip.” And while I used American figures, even “good” transit systems can be quite time consuming. When living in Tokyo (one of the best transit systems in the world where most people commute by transit) I lived very close to a subway that ran every 3-7 minutes and was a mere 15 minute ride before arriving at a stop quite near my work, but when all factors were considered (including a very long trek to/from the subway train through the station up to the street), my “15 minute train ride” was more like 45 minutes total.






  • Instance selection at sign-up remains the primary barrier to entry.

    I think there needs to be a quick question form upon sign-up, going over the biggest differences between instances. Such as: “do you want downvotes activated? Do you want to see NSFW? Do you want little, moderate, or heavy automated blocking of potentially objectionable material?” etc, then have the sign-up page provide you with up to three instance options based on your selected preferences.

    Otherwise you’re either forcing users to do this research on their own (“ew, homework just to sign up for social media? no thanks”) or they’re going in blind and selecting at random, very likely ending up on an instance with qualities/features they don’t like.

    A separate issue: during the big 2023 rexit (when I moved over), the primary instance that most new users joined, lemmy.world, was a buggy, buggy mess, practically unusable for the first few days. I don’t know if that was specifically because of the influx of new users or if it just worsened problems that had skated by when there were only a handful of users before, but I imagine the bugs turned away quite a few potential new Lemmings. Hopefully that won’t be an issue this time around, but I guess that depends on how big the exodus is and how much Lemmy infra has strengthened in the 2.5 years since.




  • Giving you an upvote because I think this is a legitimate position, but I strongly disagree. AI has become so pervasive in our lives that it’s extremely difficult to avoid even offline, so I see no problem with someone saying in an irl conversation, “I wish my mom would stop sending me AI slop videos” or “I can’t help but feel paranoid I’m going to wake up one morning and find out I’ve lost my thesis work to the latest microslop update” or “I’ve started dreading work ever since they hired ‘workslop Bill’”


  • My comment was more about the use of “female” as a noun, but your comment about which to use as an adjective raises an interesting point, especially because, as you mention, the generation to regularly say things like “woman doctor” in a not-so-great way has mostly died out. I’m not sure where things stand currently on which adjective is preferred; I think it’s mostly contextual at the moment? (Like “I would feel more comfortable being examined by a woman doctor” sounds grammatically a touch clunky but connotatively fine to me, whereas “I can’t believe what that idiot female doctor diagnosed me with” sounds grammatically correct but otherwise awful)


  • I agree that

    spoiler

    Jinx’s actions are extreme, but I think the writers do a satisfactory job of setting up the final scenes. They show Jinx overhearing Silco and her misunderstanding that he will turn her in to show her feeling cornered, they show her losing previous allies like Vi and Ekko to emphasize how she feels completely abandoned, and they show her suffering hallucinations to demonstrate her fragile mental state. What she does is sad but completely tracks with her character and the setup from previous scenes. Then her attack on the council is (I interpreted) a means of lashing out after Silco dies, while also to get revenge and honor him in a way that she thinks would have made him proud. Again, completely tracks with the setup.




  • S1 did an excellent job of its storytelling, such as show don’t tell; character actions driving the plot, not the other way around; and well-written villains with clear motives. S2 fell flat on a lot of those fronts. I’d need to rewatch it for a proper write-up, but some examples from what I remember:

    spoiler

    Jinx (and to a lesser degree Vi when interacting with Jinx) acts in a number of ways that felt entirely plot-driven. I could not take the entire Vander comes back plot line seriously (the emotional moments felt forced and cheesy). Isha was a really weak character, obviously only there for Jinx’s character development (no wonder they made her mute). It seemed like characters got killed off based on whether their survival would be inconvenient for the plot (e.g. Maddie, Loris, Isha, Vander). The Jayce torture felt excessive. Ekko turns into an exposition-spewing device. The AU plot line was forgettable. Neither Ambessa nor Viktor remotely matched Silko in terms of being a good villain. Minor characters in S2 aren’t anywhere near as rich and fleshed-out as those of S1.

    A lot of what made S1 great continues over into S2, such as the soundtrack and animation. But the character development, writing, and little details just didn’t match up in S2.