In your example you say reducing your individual CO2 print is hard. It’s not. It just has no real effect against the larger problem. The same thing is true here.

And that’s why the ads will always exist and people will always complain about them. It also funds them to eventually find ways around your individual solutions.

I guess answers like these misunderstand that you’re fighting a losing battle.

Mostly because the problem is systemic, so the response should be as well. Your answer was individualistic.

Individual change always places the blame on you. The real focus should be on the system that puts you under this pressure.

Fair

You’re supposed to be a smarter monkey?

Many monkeys can in fact swing hammers harder and faster than humans.

It doesn’t really make them better at it though

Kids will often just repeat what they’ve heard to adults.

But the largest problems to these laws is the way they affected minority groups. If followed, the law would disproportionately affect disabled and queer teens who may suddenly be unable to access help and community.

I suspect there’s some selection bias in the kids you’re speaking to.

It’s exactly the way they said drug dealers would work

One step closer to the ferengi ideal.

No doubt in response to Europe making its choice for software open source. Expect targeted attacks on FOSS to increase

I can’t access the paper but a lot of people are drawing wild conclusions from it and misrepresenting what’s there.

In short, what I could find was, they asked 40 employees from a tech startup about their AI use.

They did no comparison study or experiment.

If I had to guess the tech startup probably works in AI as well. Not exactly an unbiased study.

Quit? Only a fool would waste their time on it.