Ech

Oh, they made a post there too and got equally called out. They are desperately looking for someone to validate their bullshit.

Owner was getting burnt out and tried to spread out the work by bringing on extra admins, but it turned out to still be too much. Ended up shutting the server down as they couldn’t resolve the issues they were having. Thankfully they provided ample warning, so most communities on the instance have found other homes.

“Wait, so you’re not going to help us eliminate most of our media staff? We’re out.”

Super glad to have gotten off that shit-train last year. Still dealing with the Linux learning curve, but never going back.

Oh yeah! I’d actually forgotten that.

The best two shows for fans of criminally short series.

In a similar vein to Warehouse 13, Eureka is also a very fun SyFy channel show.

What a terrible fucking headline. Even if they kept a record of every single interaction on hand for the chatbot to reference (which is preposterous), the notion that it could reiterate it verbatim to a degree that is sufficient to hold up as evidence of anything is ludicrous. It’s also wildly inaccurate to the actual story. Bad job all around.

Fyi, you can have a psuedo-subscribe list on NP, even without an account.

It’s uncanny.

Actual AI would be more than “just math”, but LLMs aren’t AI, so the comparison is moot.

Now we’ve built a collection of simulated neurons, at a scale close to that of the human brain, and trained it on the entirety of the human language

We are not even close to anything of the sort. We’ve got a probability machine that’s mostly decent at previous collections of human language. The other two are much farther down the road (if they’re even possible) than you or the rest of the tech bros are trying to convince everyone else of.

Though commonly reported, Google doesn’t consider it a security problem when models make things up

To be clear, all llms “make things up” with every use - that’s their singular function. We need to stop imparting any level of sentience or knowledge onto these programs. At best, it’s a waste of time. At worst, it will get somebody killed.

Also, querying the program on why it fabricated something as if it won’t fabricate that answer as well is peak ignorance. “Surely it will output factual information this time!”

And yet here you are, acting like one. “Phones bad. Kids dumb. My generation’s better.”

You got that boomer energy.

Same tactic used by scammers sending “bad” messages - it’s at least partially in purpose to single out the good marks.

Didn’t they just get busted for leaking their verification data that they totally weren’t keeping?

You can’t, at least not yet. The only cross instance linkable is with communities. (i.e. !asklemmy@lemmy.world)

Anyone as in “a single person”. They don’t mean everyone has access.

Turns out Dean Norris could play a spot on trump if he’s willing to drown himself in orange makeup.

Ah shit, I hadn’t thought of that. Hopefully this gives them a kick to upgrade their system or get something of their own.