It then continues to largely repeat the same point, complete with explaining the same initialism again: “We are transitioning to an Agentic Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). AI will be the operating model we run on. This is not about ‘speeding up old processes’; it is about a world-class, agent-first development model fundamentally increasing the volume and quality of what we ship.”

We feel obliged to note that such repetition can be a sign of text that was generated by an LLM, leading us to suspect that the authors may have used such a tool. As we reported from the CentOS Connect conference last month, we sat behind a Red Hatter doing just that in a message to an email distribution list.

While “our commitment to open source and upstream is not changing,” the execs admit that “product and project development processes may diverge initially as we focus on how we build and deliver our products.” Red Hat will try to “influence community development processes such that our processes can converge over time.” It is possible this means the company might attempt to get external development communities to adopt similar practices – and that the authors anticipate significant resistance and even pushback from some communities.

Cooooool 😐

Actually it would be “Charles Darwin relax.” here. But thank you for the consideration, I feel much better. 😊

I’m upset now 😠

Political power grows from the barrel of f-droid

Spotify has ads? I’ve never paid, I thought it just had to take little breaks after some songs because they were harder to play 🤔

I care enough to laugh at them.

There is also the question of it that was set by court precedent, or settling. I would assume that settling doesn’t effect precedent.