baines

already aware, but you are way under stating the problem, time to take action  was 50 years ago

nothing we have technology wise is going to scale to what we need and we are cutting back funding not expanding currently in the US

again go read what your climate scientist are saying and watch what billionaires are doing with their money

https://reason.com/2016/09/14/send-around-this-xkcd-climate-change-web/

we’ll be fine lmao

yea now tell how any of that compares to the wet bulb crisis or ocean deoxygenation

go look up what your climate scientist are saying

we are fucked

lol if you think where we are today is anything like the last 100 years

it’s really not

I’m ok with filtering adoption to bare minimum effort

imagine instead of ai it was your compiler

we all know they can have weird quirks but imagine the fail rates were like we are experiencing with current ai

would people keep these tools in their work flow?

if big business wasn’t so hard on to cut labor the answer would be a hard no

except using your metaphor, everyone using the hammer has the same problems, and it is using said hammer as advertised, regardless of what we all know should be best practices

there have been multiple big fuck ups now and i think the reason why matters less than the fact the cause will not improve any time soon

everyone using ai says some variation of this

acting like they do proper code review on this ai gen code but we’ve had so many examples of how people well before ai carried massive tech debt and cut corners so I have zero faith

much less the numerous examples of slop laden bugs making it to live with major companies in the us

ai just amplifies and obfuscates the problem

depends

exhibit A: rfk jr

preparation and luck or nepotism

it could distort the signal or add noise

i try to typo a little bit everyday