• 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2025

help-circle

  • Good game, so far so good, just wanted to drop in and say how much I love this response (to wit)

    But also, how much I want you to understand that THAT guy is fucking right as hell, so I’d think about it a little bit 🙊🙊

    But do hope you have a better one after that parts over with 😎 like keep on being witty, just dial back on the pretense there👍

    Edit: Also wanted to add the idea that we don’t actually know if our consciousness is valid, our inherint perceptions limit us is ways we cannot evade (and can only ignore) Thus we, as the beings we are cant just validate anything, effectively cant anyway. We are all, relying on some kind of, presumably brain derived but who knows? But definitely a PERCEPTION for every kind of so-called ‘validation’ we attempt. And because people cannot seem to even truly verify perception in and of itself, we must rely on the much simpler, just-in-case-it-all-actually-is-valid model. Which is presumably what a regular person lives under (whether they acknowledge that they are is basically immaterial)

    I personally like perception problem/perception paradox for shorthand but its probably a termed philosophy idea already so establish your own guideline at their peril I suppose. You can’t really fit ‘valid’ information into a framework of ‘understood’ from that point of view and it can be pretty scary and… uncanny, if you think about it too much. But that’s okay! This dudes giving compelling evidence that intelligence(in so much as it can be perceived and witnessed by me)is not just a figment of the ol intellect but who actually fuckin knows anyways so better be worth that effort! 😹 (I like to take pedantic things to their logical conclusions, and now back to the regular life stuff 🙃😐)




  • Were at a point where you are not discussing the same thing but this might give some clarity

    He’s describing a general idea of extremist self validation of violent and hateful rhetoric in some online spaces that can, and at times, do lead to “extremism” (I hate the word but its here)

    Both the inital post, and you, are pointing out that what is being discussed in the OP (which I imagine this person has not actually read, and was intellectually pointing out some personal misery) (which I do understand for the record) is, that validation, in the sense of well meant and applied validating of ones human self or for having human experiences outside the “norm” (or inside it frankly) and being happier is not pushing people to extremism and doesn’t even apply by association to that version of validation so don’t do that type thing

    So yeah you are absolutely right there 💯

    Appreciated the heated discussion and wanted to help clearify things there 👍✌💪


  • Seriously? I just did then came to read comments, and now I’m upvoting it cause of the discussion right here

    Its probably getting downvotes, because there’s is NO fucking way it can be ‘animal free’ and ‘egg white protein’ by any stretch of the imagination and so it seems genuinely intentionally insulting to the general intellect.

    If its a legit ad its no good, if its dishonest advertisement its no better, if shitpost, then its got fuck em vegan vibes which isn’t generally well regarded with an abundance of upvotes here

    With the context of the process its totally pure, just a wholesome GD post with a self marketing vibe/look

    Without the context, its absolutely worthless, utter garbage, worth even less then no post at all, the downvotes rain down upon it, may they smite their foe.

    Its ideopolitical anger incarnate.

    Its a perfect storm post.

    And its right tf there only to be witnessed and understood for a short period of time

    Its a GOOD FUCKING day to be alive today. I live for this shit right here so thank you sm 😎😂😉







  • See how you just gaslight and deflect again and again like a pattern? Its because it is a pattern, one youre deliberately following.

    This is how you can tell. Real people don’t usually do that (unless they’re embarrassingly in the wrong and/or are emotionally triggered about it and are just having a freakout about it)

    See how its never about the conversation never about the point, just about winning some invisible game they’re playing?

    Thats what a bot having a goal is or just a person playing bullshit games and if its all about some government bs (China bad! Say it!), chances are good its some state-sponsored clown sitting on some government desk writing that shit out


  • When tf did I say state sponsored surveillance it was OK? Never that’s when.

    They made a level headed comment about how prevalent state sponsored spying is in GENERAL is bad and how everybody’s doing it and you went fucking bonkers about it.

    Then you come in with your imply, instigate shit that sounded like an LLM threw up all over the comment section

    Posts like yours are easy to spot but hard to prove to the rest of the herd because maybe your just some asshat not an actual threat because they really don’t want to believe that’s how the world works. Cause they’re people that like the blissful ignorance or are just lazy/apathetic

    But this is clearly tactically applied, and intentional manipulation of the conversation, and while its effective on some clowns its dishonest and its not effective on anyone else outside the uninformed people your playing to rn


  • Incite shit, imply shit, derail shit Incite shit, imply shit, derail shit

    Fucking state sponsored, tactical bullshit

    Nationalism might be problematic. And can be cancer but only if its not warranted. Like for ingroup validation. But if your nation is making a real effort and you are putting in real work to be part of that effort. Its fine really

    Tell me, is ALL spying bad XLE? (Taking a page from your book to point out how disingenuous it sounded when you did that to Melusine)

    (Btw the translation in human terms is something along the lines of “dance for me internet monkey” and it’s abuser tactics and usually a red flag)




  • It’s the concept that it is good to moderate these spaces like that that bothers. As a human I need to be challenged and that includes dealing with perceptibly negative commentary from people. Not just some whitewashed version of some propagandized online personas masquerading as the the “best” of human beings.

    Like IRL, any truly gratifying social function includes the possibility of heated debate and some real feelings exchanged, real things happening outside your comfort zone, not politeness theater that reassures us we are the betters in this society. And that’s all to common thinking nowadays, that we are agreeable and therfore the best thing you can be, like thats what polite type dicks/assholes are honestly. And there’s a reason you turn to online spaces to validate yourselves. Because people dont actually like you enough IRL. And you want to get social stuff done here. Likely to just exchange prefab thinking which is OK. But they want to moderate Piefed to keep it ‘whitewashed’ and that’s insulting to human intelligence and experience IMHO

    Its not your dinner party just because its your server. And if that’s why you made it. Then I think that’s self-centered, self-masturbatory and generally uncool shit instead the awesome federated space filled with reasonably unfiltered ideas that it was supposed to have been/could have been.

    Semi moderated spaces are wonderful. If its not actually bad don’t worry about it type deal. Learn to ignore, filter and move on. Just like real life. Ive reported like 3 posts total and I’ve had death threats levied and some insane people saying some intentionally horrible shit. OK, oh well, learned some shit about myself or something outside, got stronger, moved on a better more capable person. Part of life. Its not going away because you removed it from the public forum. I feel like unless its really bad. It should be witnessed. Someone got hurt by that? How much? Really? Or is it just playing into some newfound posturing contest type thing? Because that just creates a new power structure, one where to be hurt tactically in order to invalidate or validate the discussion accordingly is used and abused. Overprotection comes with serious downsides, it feels like people here dont understand this concept. You will NEVER be able to handle or win power over yourself or the world it by hiding away from what it is.

    So I appreciate the clarity but I still don’t approve of the sentiment and frankly neither should you. It alienates like 50 percent of the world and all the contributions negative and inflammatory people can make (which is plenty, truly.)

    Ive needed people to hammer into me, call me on my bullshit, and not elate just cause its perceptually harmful to my wellbeing. That’s the point. It hurt. I have to adjust or accept being a plaything for those that will do that for whatever reasons. And that’s no way to conduct yourself honestly. And many others will need that to grow and overcome things (trauma bullshit, groupthink bs, propaganda bs et al.)

    I understand wanting to make safe space for people to be in but GYATT DAMN were past the point of that utility and that being good when you start talking about making some voices (negative ones, less visible by DESIGN)

    People need to be able to make social mistakes and/or be assholes and get called on it and to leave it up as an example, not simply delete it and def not hide away from that all the time. Its helpful if people can learn to perceive things like that and toughen up so that the world doesn’t hurt us as much and we can contribute better as a member of civilization. Negative people are part of the world and have plenty to say btw. I LOVE to see those kinds of comments so this is strait bs from that POV. You can jerk off each other as much as you want but thats still gonna be true at the end of the day, and probably forever.

    Guess its time to plan out a proper server and compete at that level. Cause this circlejerking shit is just a bit too like Reddit. And I have the technical skill, I just don’t want to have to put in that high a level of effort to wake people up to that I guess.

    Sort of sorry for the essay here. Sort of not. Obviously felt it was necessary. Not all positivity is actually good positivity. And I think negative people and down voters should be equal on their own merits (tho with moderating decisions it might be considered it should almost always be by comment as well as context aware. Not just to label them as a “bad person” so your not allowed to be here type groupthinking bullshit) Each comment moderated equally on its own merits. Always and forever. (unless specifically necessary due to some incredibly remarkable circumstance and even then be SUPER careful because otherwise you miss out on the other HALF the world that will still impact your everyday life whether you understand it/that, or witness it/that, or not.

    Especially for the younger ones still trying to figure it out, its better to understand wtf is going on out there then to be caught by surprise or be unable to participate in the world because they can’t handle it as a result of this cowardice. Its not doing the world any favors. Keep the actual bots out. Leave the negativity in as long as its not an actual hazard.



  • Clearly the government does not like people seeing this absolute diabolical misrepresentation of law and a absolute miscarriage of so called “justice”.

    This guy made a tool that makes it harder to TRACK crypto transactions. That’s it. Thats all. They never had the money. They didnt do anything with the money. They just make it hard for anyone else to track your money. This whole case was fucked up beyond all recognition.

    The video is really about the general right to privacy and covers that charge. The prosecution was so badly done it that even a fucking congressman piped into the case adding “its like charging Microsoft with conspiracy to commit money laundering because some criminals used Windows/Excel to keep their ledgers” Real FUBAR shit

    Tldr: Two guys made a non custodial service that makes it harder to track crypto. And they tried to fuck them cause it makes their jobs hard.