Maybe Im just not understanding the point of the centaur analogy, but it seems more convoluting than it does useful. At least in comparison to just making the same points without the analogy.
The point of a good analogy is to make your broader points immediately register with the reader, not create an entirely new concept to explain
Maybe Im just not understanding the point of the centaur analogy, but it seems more convoluting than it does useful. At least in comparison to just making the same points without the analogy.
The point of a good analogy is to make your broader points immediately register with the reader, not create an entirely new concept to explain