

I’m not sure of the correct term. It should be obvious though that if anyone can copyright claim their own image, it would basically make taking photos in many public places impossible.


I’m not sure of the correct term. It should be obvious though that if anyone can copyright claim their own image, it would basically make taking photos in many public places impossible.


Defamation and/or tortious interference possibly?


Not necessarily. The standard of proof is different. Just because you couldn’t prove to the civil standard (on the balance of probabilities) that they infringed your copyright, it doesn’t mean the claim was false to a criminal standard (beyond reasonable doubt).


I’d settle for the government prosecuting every false copyright claim as perjury.


Lets not throw out freedom of panorama because of AI.


More instances with minimal/no defederation would help. That way you can just tell people to pick one of those instances and it doesn’t matter which one.


It’s a bit of a faff to export and import your followed community list


Republican Machiavelli? Or deliberately giving terrible advice to princes Machiavelli?
Either way he really hated mercenaries.


Paywall free link https://archive.ph/TYd4L


In the past the military would’ve had to pay an actress to pretend to be a bridge bunny.


we have microplastics instead now.


Oddly the UK is somehow ahead here https://www.gov.uk/guidance/using-open-document-formats-odf-in-your-organisation


Historia Civilis https://youtube.com/@historiacivilis
Cambrian chronicles https://youtube.com/@cambrianchronicles


I’m not convinced a president Vance would be any better.
You’d need a Case orange level event to get someone not terrible.


When did military leaders become so spineless?
Wellesley must be spinning in his grave (he probably was already at the lack of hats in parliament, but that’s besides the point)


Death.
The fact that society puts so little effort into curing it is insane to me.


fedi in general is generally anti-ai
There are some very loud people who are anti-ai, but there are also subs like !stable_diffusion@lemmy.dbzer0.com that have over 5k subscribers.


Just because that’s what the USA first amendment regulates, it does not mean that is what the concept itself is.
How fucking hard is it to put a $2 ultrasonic distance sensor on the front. I built robots when I was a kid that wouldn’t do this.
This has been solved for 50 years FFS. Yet here we are with techbros thinking cameras can solve everything.