An Ai has more information than the average human and yet…

I had never heard that interpretation but it basically sounds sort of like the premise for The Good Place

So it’s Microslop’s Rule 34?

I mean, can’t you just make your own graphic novel / book tailored to what you want then based on this question?

PotionCraft actually, now that I think about it

Comparing the dotcom bubble to the AI bubble is like comparing a corn kernel to a corn cob at this point.

The US economy was more spread out and varied back then, and the bubble wasn’t over a third of the entire economy.

And you know, the internet actually had market value and was producing profit immediately at least. AI still has yet to turn any profits.

The second one just seems contradictory tbh, how can it be both?

Well that’s the nature of paradoxes, isn’t it? But paradox philosophy is a whole 'nother can of worms and a very long discussion in of itself, though you’ve probably encountered some examples before, such as this one:

The next sentence is true. The prior sentence is false.

It results in an endless loop. Contradictory, yes, yet both sentences still exist, and are sentences.

The third one is interesting - but subjectively feeling like we have free will isn’t the same as objectively having it.

Yes, true, but the point of that third one is that the result would be the same in the sense that in both cases, humans believe they have free will, and therefore their actions are determined by that, whether or not that path was outlined beforehand by a being we cannot fathom / fully comprehend or not. The actions will still become as they are.

I’ve also heard this third argument combined a bit with the second one as an attempt to better make sense of the paradox (although by doing so, it’s really not a paradox anymore), and that is that God knows all possible paths humans would take, but not necessarily which one / God made infinite path he knows the outcome of but we are free to pick which one we take.

This issue I have with that one is that it’s no longer a truly full omniscient being at that point.

There’s 3 philosophies I’ve seen on that question.

One is the planned domino effect, which another commentator already mentioned.

The next is the “paradoxical being” one, which is that something that is omniscient is paradoxical by default, therefore it can both know what will happen and simultaneously not know what will happen.

The last is the “unknown destiny” one, which is that even if we don’t actually have free will, as long as we think we do and can’t prove we don’t, then does it matter? Because ultimately it would be no different to us than if we actually did have it.

Local wannabe crack dealer Mike Masnick says crack isn’t harmful, life without it would be boring. More at 11

It’s funny because that means something like freaking Neurosama made by a YouTuber could probably do better at AGI than these multi billion dollar companies due to it being designed so it can modify it’s own code depending on the task given (and at one point, doing so while not directly prompted).

Of course, this makes Neurosama completely useless at work focused tasks outside of coding, because it can and does refuse to do things on purpose.

And that’s exactly why you won’t see AGI coming from any huge business corporation - because they’re trying to make something that replaces workers, rather than something that has no direct purpose.

(Disclaimer - this is not to say Neurosama is AGI in any way, just that it could probably do the tasks much better than the mainstream AIs can, because it has been build with flexibility and adaptability in mind.)

I think this might fail for the same reason VPN companies began succeeding.

Porn.

Just have a few organizations say “Want everyone at Amazon/Microslop to know your fetishes and what porn you search for? Buy (thin client offered) now!”

Sure. Let them be sued on profits made 😂

I think they wouldn’t know what to do with a horse. If it’s AI powered it’ll probably ignored. If it’s hand programmed I doubt the programmers considered horse or horse like beings

I feel like this is the exact argument made against playing violent video games, especially having lived through the 90s.

I’d rather see if there’s any actual data supporting the assessment.

I bet these would be fooled by you dressing as a bear. Or a horse.

Dildoes what Nintendon’t

Last I checked that was pansexual. Idk where you got that definition though.

Just saying, the way you describe it comes off like the “no homo” guys is all 😅

I’m polyamorous and none us three would do that. It’s still a closed relationship - one night stands break that.

Y’all are definitely polysexual. It’s just a semi-open type rather than fully open like swingers.

If they say it’s being used to train AI, and then refer to the Facebook case, should work out for them.

A cheap 3060 on a local Finnish used item online store (Tori)

Was so excited about the price I completely missed that the description said it was only partially functional and likely had a single fuse burnt or something.

Spent days trying to figure out why it kept outputting on 240p for the OS except in text only mode, only to eventually go back to the listing to see if I could return and read that they mentioned it wasn’t fully functional.

Deep regrets.

If anyone knows how to repair a graphics card though and wants it however, let me know and I’ll give it for cheaper than I paid for. I’ll regret it much less then.