But they’re coming for everything. There won’t be anywhere to go to get information. You’ll give up everything?

If you’re getting the ads you’re there to watch something you wanted to watch.

It’s difficult… We’re not very good at determining what is right and then enforcing it, so we have this weird hybrid system of semi-freedom with some exceptions, and sometimes the utility is responsible and sometimes the user and sometimes it’s free speech or protected art and sometimes it’s not protected speech and it’s not protected art.

Sometimes I think we should encode lessons we’ve learned as evil because they are clearly evil and bad for society, and to ban/prosecute them, but then I look at our world and you realize we can’t be trusted to encode the right things or properly follow through.

As much as anyone may dislike it, it’s a form of private journalism, private opinion, and private art, and almost all the content itself is free speech. You have to regulate the medium as harmful, very specifically described functionality. What is not protected is stuff like infinite scrolling, but something like comments and voting are likely also protected as speech.

I’m ok with both going. Ymmv

It’s all assholes… all the way up, and all the way down. If you’re lucky you find few good ones in the middle if you make it there for long enough.

Good, speed up the pace, weed them out, praise be Darwin

You just need literally anything else other than the native browser to do it no?

If services aren’t within 5-10 minutes maximum, people will not walk or bike there. That’s often greater than the distance just to get out of some neighborhoods.

If public transportation is not within 5 minutes or so, people will not use it.

The cost of a car can be under 10/day. If public transport is even half that for full day multistop use, people won’t use it.

Soft enough to let you down gently as it takes your job

Humans have a complex history of great community, but also we kill other humans… A lot. Others are dangerous by default.

Why young children assign better attributes to some dolls regardless of their own culture may be an open question, but colors likely have their own bouba/Kiki effect.

Private tenant doesn’t guarantee privacy, only the data cleansing policy does, since you’re certainly sending data outside the tenant to process by AI. Even if the model is local, each model instance must only have access to a single patient’s data to ensure privacy, else it’s possible an exploit could grab everything or to hallucinate someone else’s data.

Go read ncbi, it’s a trivial search… Babies as young as 3 months prefer own race, and children as young as 2-3 exhibit doll preference and attribute more good attributes to white dolls. Racism and sameness grouping starts very very early and is not entirely socially learned… Its basis is innate and instinctual.

You should read more studies on babies. They absolutely do have innate bias. Your post screams “I’m just guessing”

Determine which habits are good, bad, neutral. Then anything good or neutral, determine good frequency. Then cycle frequency to optimize utility vs. adaptation/addiction/increased requirements. Anything bad, eliminate.

There is no such thing. Men date women, period, and it doesn’t matter their looks or age or often their personality. The only way to stay alone as a woman is to not go out. Post on NSFW and ask what people think. I bet your dms explode.

I mean, I definitely agree on this specific use-case that it’s problematic. I think some aspects can be resolved with smart contracts or multi-signature requirements, but it really fails here when it comes to compulsion.

If a court cannot compel someone to transfer, because the court doesn’t have the keys… Or you lose the keys and cannot… Obviously this falls apart.

There is a reason people deride nfts, mostly it’s due to ignorance and spectacle lemming behavior surrounding the ape pictures, but the legitimate criticism is really there aren’t many use-cases. But we don’t and shouldn’t wait to build things until a use-case exists. Nfts could be important eventually for preventing things like naked shorts maybe. There are likely very valuable use-cases.

Fortunately our unfortunately that’s all a blockchain is lol. It’s not really different than an exchange pointing to a blockchain and people agreeing 1 bitcoin on that chain is worth X. You always need consensus from multiple entities, but the difference is these ledgers are public, and secured by math. That’s it.

Probably is, but the concept is sound. The inspections and other things aren’t always necessary, but even if they are, an nft transfer can likely be setup to be digitally signed by the recognizing authority. This creates a record on the public ledger rather than a private one, which can be a nice thing. For better or worse nft confers ownership of recognized by such an authority, so there is no concept of not allowed to sell. This is a fundamental feature of blockchain… Enforced control and ownership

It’s just a technology even though people equate it with wildly overpriced art you can copy and paste, which is naive and reductive.