The numbers don’t make sense here. The monthly cost to store that sort in data is way more than what they are asking for here. Even if they somehow extracted it to drives they own its over a million dollars just in drives.

Bit over 200 but this is a collection I’ve been building for around 20 years or so.

then they’d just randomly cause intense sharp pinpricks of pain randomly for the rest of my life.

If it helps at all, your body will push foreign objects like glass out of your body. You’ll probably get a glass like sliver after a while that you could pull out.

if the test comes back negative, it’s wrong only about 3 times out of 10,000,”

This is a hard one. While this could lead to an increase in the frequency of body scans, it’s being said by a healthcare ceo so I kind of need him to play a game a Luigi’s Mansion before I can listen to him.

There are libraries that can polyfill this with almost zero effort. List should not effect any active site that offers rss feeds.

That’s a lot of words to say I’m being incendiary. Which I won’t disagree with but the post itself is as are every other comment I read before posting.

The difference is I read the article and they reacted to a blurb designed to make them react exactly as they reacted.

The thread is bait and I’m calling out people for being so easily baited and suggesting why I believe they are being baited, the incendiary part.

Anyone is free to disagree but that isn’t what happened, instead everyone has made excuses for why their reaction was justified.

This means I correctly predicted at some level why they reacted to the bait. So why am I the only one in the wrong here?

There is proof, his words.

Do you have male friends with daughters? Any of them that talk like this, aren’t going near mine.

It’s a massive red flag. Pedophiles talk exactly like this, they need to normalize their behavior.

My problems? You’re going need to be more specific. I suspect you’re not seriously asking becuase you don’t actually give a shit about me at any level and assume I feel the same way.

What I see is a complete lack of sympathy for why women feel this is needing. Instead it’s men feeling attacked and it’s done with a level of hysteria that prevents a rational discussion.

We can get to a decentralized system by ignoring why people feel they need a centralized system. But we’re not able to talk about that because male fragile egos dominate the conversations.

might have actually done it.

Why give him the benefit of the doubt here with everything known about him. It’s more likely than not he rape her and even more likely he molested her.

And people like you and the other men in this thread are why women won’t support anarchy.

Stop being a stereotype.

I knew it would. These systems are needed because of the men making these comments. The irony is lost on them but I find it quite hilarious.

But the system she is developing does not use cameras and, instead, monitors crowds as anonymous dots on a map. Only when it spots a potential issue are CCTV cameras directed on the individuals, or security personnel sent to the scene.

“Our aim there is to respect public privacy - so really understand that people don’t want to be continually monitored when there’s no need to be - but also make spaces safe,” she says. The process has undergone simulated trials and will soon move to tests in real-life scenarios.

Either none of the commenters read the article or they’re all the type confused by women choosing the bear.

Nothing but fragile male egos on display.

Collecting data to allocate limited resources and you’re all acting like it’s a personal attack on your manhood with some are as an reason to lean in on their toxic masculinity.

It is the advertising of any market differentiator or specifically when it’s for security.

Then it doesn’t happen. Your fear is not my fear.

Would you rather they ended up with zero dollars?

Yes.

The only terms under which I could potential accept tax money being used to save a company from a collapse leading to massive layoffs, is if the resulting company is also made entirely employee owned.

When you take into account inflation and the overall market gains over that time, they absolutely did not make their money back.

Having a vendor explicitly supporting it…epic is an understatement.

it’s because every device connected to a cell halves the bandwidth available to each device, and after something like 30-40 devices the cell is full.

I don’t know where you’re getting this from. There not how cells have worked since at least 3g, sort of sounds like how consumer grade WiFi hardware operates.

Towers are designed with sectors that are directional and each can support thousands of devices but those can’t handle 10k people at a stadium.

If you had bothered to read the article youd have read they are talking about how stadiums are now using distributed antenna systems (DAS), which is basically hundreds of antennas spread over the venue and fed directly into fiber. Each one is designed to handle a small section. The carriers do need to hook into the endpoint here so this isn’t something that can be setup on a whim.

I don’t see it mentioned but there are also mobile units, cellular on wheels (COWS) are common one and they really easy to spot if know to look for them. Basically a cell tower on trailer that can use microwave for the back haul for when on site fiber isn’t available.

If you end up at a venue and can’t get service it’s because the venue is too cheap to use any of these existing options. They could also be using some outdated antennas, LTE can’t handle as many connections as the new 5G stuff.