Buried in the story was a deceptively simple question: does your AI agent count as an employee?

At a recent conference, Microsoft executive Rajesh Jha floated a provocative idea. In a future where companies deploy fleets of AI agents, those agents may need their own identities — logins, inboxes, and even seats inside software systems. If so, AI wouldn’t shrink software revenue. It could expand it.

  • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Building software for humans is over. I say this and I build software for a living. I don’t write code anymore. No one I work with writes code anymore.

    Everyone is at different stages of acceptance with this, so I understand people having an attitude about it. It doesn’t change anything.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I look forward to your vibe coded copy of photoshop, I assume you’ll have it whipped up lickity split?

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Cool, so until that point in time, my point still stands. You can’t just hand waive and say “it’ll happen eventually” and be expected to be taken seriously.

          • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            You picked one arbitrary example and hold it up as proof that no one can build complex apps with AI? You know there is more than one example of a complex app. Apple has reported an 84% increase in App Store submissions. That’s pretty much all AI driven.

            • fodor@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Right right. There’s an AI bubble, and there are AI scams. Of course people will ride the bubble, and scammers will always be with us. Doesn’t mean any of that work is quality, or that it will edge out the other work.

              • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                We are debating whether AI can write a complex app. I don’t know what scams has to do with anything. You’re simply asserting that all AI code is a scam. That’s odd because major companies that don’t scam their customers are shipping AI generated code into production everyday now. For many companies, no humans are writing code anymore. Must not be terrible code then. In my experience, it’s better than what most humans write. Humans are sloppy and take shortcuts.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Private companies want the AI cash to ride the bubble. So they’ll use AI, or say they are, just to get the investment money. Doesn’t mean it’s good, true, or worthwhile, or efficient.

      The real test is what the open source community does. And right now, they aren’t doing what you’re doing. We’ll see what the future brings, but I don’t trust your gut any more than I trust my own.