• OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      With the resources they have – and the goal of having security and control over their digital supply lines – I don’t see why they wouldn’t roll their own distro. Maybe heavily based on an existing distro (looking at you, Debian) but something that’s completely under their control, so they can choose for themselves exactly what packages are included, what security settings are used as defaults, when and if to update things, etc.


      Edit: after (gasp) actually reading the article, it seems that each department within the French government will be responsible for their own implementation, which means they might all end up using different distros in different departments.

      • WFH@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s either a political move (nobody wants to be responsible for and/or depend on another ministry), or 4D chess where they would prevent a single vulnerability to expose the entire user base.

        Fun fact, Orange (former France Telecom) has developed its own distro for the best part of the last 25 years. It’s… very peculiar.

        By who are we kidding. The actual work will be offloaded to the shittiest contractor available (Capgemini/Atos/SopraSteria), it will take 5 years of the planned 2 and will cost 3.5 times the initial budget, for something sensibly shittier than an uBlue script.

      • Archer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        That seems odd, that just means higher costs for support. Pick one distro then do custom packages or Ansible for your stuff that you want on top but don’t go a million different ways

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 day ago

          Going a millions different ways is more in the FOSS spirit than starting off by saying ‘everyone will use this list of software’. They can’t know what will be the best fit for everyone so they’re approaching it flexibly.

          They can iterate in the future or come up with standards as they need, but in the beginning it’s better to try a lot of different things to see what people discover.