• HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    >= 33 years

    • Unix
    • C
    • the shell and commands like cd, ls, find, xarg, cp, mv, ln, df, du

    >= 32 years

    • vi/vim
    • LaTeX
    • tar

    >= 28 years

    • Emacs
    • awk, bash
    • C++
    • Linux

    >= 26 years

    • Python & Numerical Python
    • screen and tmux
    • rsync
    • ssh
    • InkScape

    >= 20 years

    • git
    • literate programming tools

    >= 17 years

    • Thunderbird & forks
    • Debian & Ubuntu
    • GNOME

    >= 15 years

    • MeeGo, Maemo, Sailfish & siblings
    • Lisps (Clojure, Guile, Racket)

    >= 11 years

    • tiling WMs (i3)
    • Arch (as second system)

    what I use now and will very, very likely still use in 10 years

    • Rust
    • Guix
    • Gollum wiki
    • Gemini protocol
      • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Arch is often pictured as some Uber hacker magic which it isn’t. It is a useful collection of software packages with great documentation.

        Arch is for example useful if you want to program with new Rust versions, tools like jujutsu, cross-compile for your Sailfish phone, and so on.

        (By the way, Guix features now a recent Rust/cargo version, too!)

        And both Debian and Arch have advantages / disadvantages, so both are useful for different tasks. Learning Arch is really not a big step or costs much time if you know the foundations of Linux.

        • laurathepluralized@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          +1 on the great documentation! Have I ever used Arch? No, and there are enough distros out there that I’m not sure I ever will. But have I ever referenced Arch’s wiki? Yes, often, and plan to continue to do so. <3 to the Arch Wiki authors!