Wouldn’t that be enough to be considered inferior in your book?
It is always useful to take into the account a “credit of trust” toward babies and aknowledge of previous achievements if we talk about elders. You see, most of local moralists are American racists, so whatever they hear they apply to their sick racist worldview. So whatever they hear they try to apply to divide HUMANS. I wasn’t talk about humans. Most humans (except clinically ill) have +- the comparable level of intellect, so I consider them +- equal to me.
Being stupider is enough to be considered inferior. It is more complicated, but overall intelligence is the main criteria.
Would killing babies or elderly people be okay then? They can both be much more ignorant than the average person.
No, it wouldn’t. I leave it to you to figure out why.
I mean they are “stupider”, at least the babies. Wouldn’t that be enough to be considered inferior in your book?
It is always useful to take into the account a “credit of trust” toward babies and aknowledge of previous achievements if we talk about elders. You see, most of local moralists are American racists, so whatever they hear they apply to their sick racist worldview. So whatever they hear they try to apply to divide HUMANS. I wasn’t talk about humans. Most humans (except clinically ill) have +- the comparable level of intellect, so I consider them +- equal to me.
You were referring to non-human animals then?
Wasn’t that obvious from the thread’s theme?
This is a genuine question, not an insult: do you have any kind of impairment when it comes to conversations and exchanging thoughts?
I might have: English isn’t my first (or even second) language. But I consider it good enough for talking at Internet forums.
So nobody ever has to worry? Good to know.
lol