stephen01king

No, they said “it felt right” which is incomprehensible to anyone that doesn’t have any experience with how a CFD results generally looks like.

Probably having thousands of Chrome tabs open.

You’d probably enjoy skyrim more if you added some mods to help with the UI.

Unfortunately they don’t explain what the attacks were in the article. Gonna need to find the paper to know.

I mean, I can definitely feel my brain function deteriorating by the minute.

I did the same thing. In my defence, I am really really sleepy right now.

I don’t know what you’re even arguing. Your analogy breaks down because in this case, we can’t even see if the raven is black or not. No one can theoretically prove consciousness. The rest of your comments seems to be arguing that current AI has no consciousness, which is exactly what I said, so I guess this is just an attempt at supporting my point?

Everything you said is right, but you’re only proving that LLM weights is a severely simplified version of neurons. It neither disproves that they don’t have consciousness or that being a mathematical model precludes it from having consciousness at all.

In my opinion, the current models doesn’t express any consciousness, but I am against saying they don’t because they are a mathematical model rather than by the results we can measure. The fact that we can’t theoretically prove consciousness in the human brain also means we can’t theoretically disprove consciousness in an LLM model. They aren’t conscious because they haven’t expressed enough to be considered conscious, and that’s the extent we should claim to know.

Okay, now explain how the human neuron expresses consciousness.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen a 10 metre banana.

I double checked and still don’t see the rage you’re referring to.

Who is raging against buses, though? As you said, there are circumstances where its not practical to have both, but that still doesn’t make bus only network better than having a mixed network. We’re speaking relatively here, not in absolutes. When I say one is better, it doesn’t mean the other is bad.

To consider all expect, just having only a bus network to rely on is also bad. Less options for people to choose from and still more at mercy of traffic conditions than tram networks even assuming the city has dedicated bus lanes.

In terms of pollution, they are also worse since electric buses are still rare and still a lot less convenient than electrified tram networks. All of these disadvantages grow even more when compared to metro trains and subways.

The reason buses are used over tram networks and metros are route flexibility, lower upfront cost and less space required for facilities. At least, that’s what I can think of off the top of my head. Maybe you can add more advantages bus networks provide over rail network to support your position better.

No, it’s just that on a ranking of resource efficiency, railway systems are certainly better than buses.

It sounds so much better, though. They aren’t pretending to be humans, so the context of the conversation is more interesting to me.

I still have this issue on my Pop_OS! laptop.