

Literally! They were told to return to office to achieve higher productivity (it was circling the news around September?)
Nobody asked you to be dumb, and yet here we are. Just delete the damn comment already.
I mean do you even read yourself?


It literally isn’t. Google shareholder primacy and you’ll notice its a norm, not a law (in the USA).
You can also Google Midjourney.


You do realise that prompts to and responses from the LLM are not as simple as what you wrote “1+1=?”. The context window is growing for a reason. And LLMs dont have two dimensional probability of the next token?
Literally post about encouraging discussion on lemmy dude.


You can obtain token probabilities, so you can give some estimate out-of-band confidence in a response, down to the token level.
That means literally nothing. You can get wrong answer with 100% token confidence, and correct one with 0.000001% confidence.


Interestingly they are not. Its commonly shilled by C-scum, but it’s a lie.


Interestingly its not.


Midjourney is profitable


The “fault” means nothing to “deaths per miles” statistic though?


Not just lower, a tiny fraction of the human rate of accidents:
https://www.iihs.org/research-areas/fatality-statistics/detail/state-by-state
Well, no. Lets talk fatality rate. According to linked data, human drivers
1.26 deaths per 100 million miles traveled
Vs Waymo 2 deaths per 127 million miles :)


Isn’t Waymo rate better because they are very particular where they operate? When they are asked to operate in sligthly less than perfect conditions it immediately goes downhill https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385936888_Identifying_Research_Gaps_through_Self-Driving_Car_Data_Analysis (page 7, Uncertainty)
Edit: googled it a bit, and apparently Waymo mostly drives in
Waymo vehicles primarily drive on urban streets with a speed limit of 35 miles per hour or less
Teslas do not.


What if I want to contribue to a FoSS project because I’m using it but I don’t want to make new friends?
I mean… Learn to write well, that would help too?
You can increase that message readability by a lot simply by adding a dot.
Communities are made of people.
It won't work if blablabla.


Ooh, I see. Your argument is not that “people with jobs don’t go hungry in the USA”, but “it’s worse in Latin American countries famously exploited by the USA”.
Got it.


I think Democracy (in its many forms) designed with checks and balances is a viable answer to the problem
Yeah, you wish. Electoralism will always work in favour of the wealthy class. Even damn ancient Greeks knew that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sortition
As a foreigner whose native tongue has gendered nouns and adjectives: we default to sir to sir-presenting people, ma’am to ma’am presenting, and "sir? ma’am? " when unsure and clarification is needed.
I do not understand why you’d want to preemptively force gender someone by choosing a neutral/or newspeak/ form of address - to me it seems much much much worse than defaulting to asking for preference (“sir? ma’am?” option is the best - it declares you’ve noticed the interlocutor is a nb and passes the ball to them).
If you’re looking for 1 word that would always work, I recommend embracing your inner old British Lady and calling everyone pet (petal), dear or love. :-)