Republicans/billionaires have the FTC hogtied, so all the mergers are practically getting rubber stamped with no restrictions. They ousted the trust busters from the agency

Build out swathes of affordable housing/mixed use properties in large enough numbers to drive down the prices city wide.

Yes that’s the joke because saying decades means you’re not close and can’t really guess as to how far of you are.

Usually, saying it’s 2 years out, means they have something workable but scaling to production is still in progress.

We’ll have to see if this is just marketing hype or not.

There’s a bunch of US companies hyping it, too. A free claiming they’ll be selling power as soon as 2028 (such as Helion in their deal with Microsoft)

There’s some very aggressive autocorrect programs that seem to be bloating all their current software. They should start with taking those out.

Weirdly judgemental of people looking to meet others…

You just outed yourself as young. It’s a holdover from physical film cameras, when film came in a roll. I’m digital, it’s just your “photos taken on this device” folder

The point that is clearly not sinking into your wired-to-argue-for-no-reason brain, is that it gets rid of the shit that Google is fucking with. Which is what they were concerned about, not the underlying structure of the OS being offensive to them.

It would severally hurt small time manufacturers, so yeah, probably.

Worse, they treat it as not-litter, unlike anything else.

So as a one issue voter, you’d vote for the people doing the thing you don’t like more than the other group, instead of those doing it less?

And you called your cons dumb…

The Republican supermajority in Ohio that passed ID checks for websites months ago thinks you’re a moron for continuing to blame only Democrats for this shit

The ones listed are not working within the law. They raped children.

Those people should probably start parenting their own children instead of begging for the government to do it for them, then.

And yes, it’s usually the same people.

Sure, no reason it couldn’t be, other than it isn’t.

If they wanted to actually protect children, they’d be arresting the pedophiles, not forcing everyone to identify themselves on the Internet.

Meh, even that is different. One facilitates an activity YOU partake in. The other is an activity you watch others do. Obsessing over how well grown men perform at children’s games is odd. Structuring your weekend around observing other people exercise while you sit on the couch…is weird.

That is like pushing someone into the deep end of weird.

I know you’re struggling to get into this genre, here try this story about a kid who grows a phallic unicorn horn from his forehead…

I read that as: someone other than the author.

This can and should be done internally. Why would it need to be a third party? Any publisher that cares about their reputation anyway. Fact-checkers are a real thing. They routinely follow up on interviews to make sure authors aren’t bullshitting.

That used to be the standard…